no-std: optee-utee: make panic_handler optional #147
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DemesneGH
reviewed
Oct 25, 2024
|
LGTM. @b49020 any comments? |
|
With the patches squashed, feel free to add:
|
|
Ready to merge, please squash the commits into one and append the tags in commit message: Thanks! |
Make panic_handler optional for no-std TAs by adding "no_panic_handler" feature flag. It allows no-std TAs to have a custom panic handler. Signed-off-by: ivila <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Yuan Zhuang <[email protected]>
|
Sorry for late reply, done. |
|
Merged, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make panic_handler optional for no-std TAs by adding "no_panic_handler" feature flag. It allows no-std TAs to have a custom panic handler.
Relative issue is here: #145
This PR is a recreate one, the former PR was closed due to using the wrong branch(as metioned in #143 , the only maintenance branch should be main.