-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implemented Lab4 numeronym and test cases #542
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #542 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 95 96 +1
Lines 1627 1638 +11
=====================================
+ Hits 1627 1638 +11
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good 👍 The only thing I could suggest is to split iteration over arguments and computing numeronym into separate functions, but it's no required in my mind.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. A good set of test cases too. Just one thing to fix for executing the test case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Great looking Go code. Thanks.
When you merge, can you either do a squash merge, or you could do a local rebase and squash and then force push. This ensures that master does not contain any fixup commits - just to good stuff. It keeps the history clean. If you do a rebase and force-push, ping me on slack when you've done it and i'll re-approve right away (since force pushing drops any current approvals).
Fixes #
Review of colleague's PR #518
Changes proposed in this PR:
04_numeronym/sirigithub