Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Test for ansible_id in serialized assignments #527

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: devel
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AlanCoding
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@john-westcott-iv john-westcott-iv changed the title Test for ansible_id in serialized assignments [WIP] Test for ansible_id in serialized assignments Jul 30, 2024
@john-westcott-iv
Copy link
Member

@AlanCoding is this still something we want to pursue?

@AlanCoding
Copy link
Member Author

I just rebased, if it passes the checks we should merge it to get that coverage.

@AlanCoding
Copy link
Member Author

Oh gosh, this does seem like a bug

    @pytest.mark.django_db
    def test_user_assignment_ansible_id(admin_api_client, inv_rd, rando, inventory):
        resource = Resource.objects.get(object_id=rando.pk, content_type=ContentType.objects.get_for_model(rando).pk)
        url = get_relative_url('roleuserassignment-list')
        data = dict(role_definition=inv_rd.id, content_type='aap.inventory', user_ansible_id=str(resource.ansible_id), object_id=inventory.id)
        response = admin_api_client.post(url, data=data, format="json")
        assert response.status_code == 201, response.data
        assert rando.has_obj_perm(inventory, 'change')
>       assert response.data['user_ansible_id'] == str(resource.ansible_id)
E       AssertionError: assert None == '60a212a1-6796-4e3b-a790-75a2d3e97bc8'
E        +  where '60a212a1-6796-4e3b-a790-75a2d3e97bc8' = str(UUID('60a212a1-6796-4e3b-a790-75a2d3e97bc8'))
E        +    where UUID('60a212a1-6796-4e3b-a790-75a2d3e97bc8') = <Resource: Resource object (350)>.ansible_id

If we don't include the user ansible_id, fine for now, I guess. But if we're returning None for its value, that would be a problem that should be fixed.

I should have better documented this before.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants