Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add unit test fixtures for manifest-only connectors to CDK #121

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

ChristoGrab
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChristoGrab ChristoGrab commented Dec 4, 2024

What

Adds reusable test fixtures to the CDK to support unit testing in manifest-only connectors. The goal is to provide centralized fixtures for loading custom components and manifest files so we don't have to copy/paste them for each individual connector to enable unit tests.

How

  • Added new module manifest_only_fixtures.py in airbyte_cdk/test/utils/ containing reusable pytest fixtures
  • This file contains three session-scoped fixtures:

connector_dir: Provides the root directory of the connector being tested
components_module: Dynamically loads the connector's custom components module
manifest_path: Provides the path to the connector's manifest file

  • No additional dependencies should be required as the module uses existing dev dependencies (pytest) and standard library modules

User Impact

This PR only adds the discoverable fixtures for use by manifest-only connector test suites. There should be no effect/impact on CDK functionality in production. The code to run manifest-only unit tests will be added to airbyte-ci's test command in a separate PR

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced pytest fixtures to support testing of manifest-only connectors.
    • Added functionality to determine the connector directory and load the components module.
    • Provided a fixture for accessing the connector's manifest file path.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 4, 2024
@ChristoGrab ChristoGrab marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 21:57
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new file, manifest_only_fixtures.py, containing several pytest fixtures aimed at testing manifest-only connectors within the Airbyte framework. These fixtures include connector_dir, which identifies the connector's root directory; components_module, which attempts to load the components module; and manifest_path, which provides the path to the connector's manifest file. These fixtures are designed for use in the unit_tests directory and enhance the testing capabilities for manifest-only connectors.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
airbyte_cdk/test/utils/manifest_only_fixtures.py Added three pytest fixtures: connector_dir, components_module, and manifest_path.

Suggested reviewers

  • erohmensing
  • aaronsteers

What do you think about reaching out to these reviewers for their insights? Wdyt?


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbbeeb2 and 763d247.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • airbyte_cdk/test/utils/manifest_only_fixtures.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • airbyte_cdk/test/utils/manifest_only_fixtures.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
airbyte_cdk/test/utils/manifest_only_fixtures.py (3)

11-16: Documentation looks great! Consider adding a minimal example?

The documentation clearly explains how to import the fixtures. What do you think about adding a minimal example showing how these fixtures might be used in a test case? Something like:

def test_my_connector(components_module, manifest_path):
    assert components_module.MyComponent  # example usage
    assert manifest_path.exists()  # example usage

wdyt? 🤔


32-52: Robust implementation with graceful error handling! Consider adding debug logs?

The implementation handles all edge cases gracefully, but what do you think about adding some debug logs to help troubleshoot when things go wrong? Something like:

 if not components_path.exists():
+    logger.debug(f"No components.py found at {components_path}")
     return None

 components_spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("components", components_path)
 if components_spec is None:
+    logger.debug("Failed to create module spec for components.py")
     return None

This could make it easier to understand why a component module wasn't loaded. wdyt? 🤔


1-57: Excellent architectural choices! 🎯

The session-scoped fixtures are well-designed for reusability and efficiency. The separation of concerns between directory resolution, component loading, and manifest path management is clean and maintainable.

A few thoughts on the architecture:

  1. The fixtures are independent yet composable
  2. Session scope ensures optimal performance
  3. Error handling is graceful and non-blocking

This will make testing manifest-only connectors much more straightforward!

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a712441 and dbbeeb2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • airbyte_cdk/test/utils/manifest_only_fixtures.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
airbyte_cdk/test/utils/manifest_only_fixtures.py (1)

19-30: Clean implementation of directory resolution! 👍

The fixture elegantly handles both local development and CI environments. The session scope is perfect for this use case since the directory won't change during the test run.

airbyte_cdk/test/utils/manifest_only_fixtures.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@bnchrch bnchrch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well done Christo! Lets get this in

@ChristoGrab ChristoGrab merged commit ed9a5e7 into main Dec 10, 2024
24 of 26 checks passed
@ChristoGrab ChristoGrab deleted the christo/manifest-only-unit-test-fixturs branch December 10, 2024 23:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants