Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue1128 #200

Closed
Closed

Conversation

ClemensBuechner
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ClemensBuechner ClemensBuechner changed the title Issue1128. Issue1128 Dec 19, 2023
@ClemensBuechner ClemensBuechner force-pushed the cegar-pdbs-all-goals branch 3 times, most recently from 53be233 to 5e71b61 Compare January 9, 2024 09:45
@@ -385,7 +389,7 @@ bool CEGAR::get_flaws_for_pattern(
log << "plan did not lead to a goal state: ";
}
bool raise_goal_flaw = false;
for (const FactPair &goal : goals) {
for (const FactPair &goal : use_restricted_goal ? goals : task_properties::get_fact_pairs(task_proxy.get_goals())) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find this a bit unintuitive. At this point goals is something that is passed to the class in the constructor. Instead of passing goals and an option that essential is ignore_the_goal_I_gave_you_and_use_something_else, can we handle the option earlier and just pass a modified goal vector to the class?

@maltehelmert
Copy link
Contributor

We are closing this pull request because we are not planning to pursue this idea further at this time.

See the tracker for more details (https://issues.fast-downward.org/issue1128).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants