-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
193 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ | ||
| @Article{Draper2022, | ||
| abstract = {Abstract It has become increasingly apparent that publishing research on child development from certain countries is especially challenging. These countries have been referred to collectively as the Majority World, the Global South, non-WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic), or low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to these persistent challenges, and provide constructive recommendations to contribute to better representation of children from these countries in child development research. In this paper, we outline the history of publication bias in developmental science, and issues of generalization of research from these countries and hence where it ?fits? in terms of publishing. The importance of explaining context is highlighted, including for research on measurement child development outcomes, and attention is drawn to the vicious publication-funding cycle that further exacerbates the challenges of publishing this research. Specific recommendations are made to assist child development journals achieve their stated goals of creating a more inclusive, equitable, diverse, and global field of child development.}, | ||
| author = {Catherine E Draper and Lisa M Barnett and Caylee J Cook and Jorge A Cuartas and Steven J Howard and Dana C McCoy and Rebecca Merkley and Andres Molano and Carolina Maldonado-Carre{\~n}o and Jelena Obradovic and Gaia Scerif and Nadia C Valentini and Fotini Venetsanou and Aisha K Yousafzai}, | ||
| doi = {10.1002/icd.2375}, | ||
| issn = {1522-7227}, | ||
| issue = {n/a}, | ||
| journal = {Infant and Child Development}, | ||
| keywords = {Global South,LMIC,Majority World,WEIRD,publication bias}, | ||
| month = {10}, | ||
| note = {https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2375}, | ||
| pages = {e2375}, | ||
| publisher = {John Wiley & Sons, Ltd}, | ||
| title = {Publishing child development research from around the world: An unfair playing field resulting in most of the world's child population under-represented in research}, | ||
| volume = {n/a}, | ||
| url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2375}, | ||
| year = {2022}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{Henrich2010, | ||
| abstract = {Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these “standard subjects” are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re‐organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.}, | ||
| archiveprefix = {arXiv}, | ||
| arxivid = {arXiv:1011.1669v3}, | ||
| author = {Joseph Henrich and Steven J. Heine and Ara Norenzayan}, | ||
| journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences}, | ||
| doi = {10.1017/S0140525X0999152X}, | ||
| eprint = {arXiv:1011.1669v3}, | ||
| isbn = {0140-525X}, | ||
| issn = {14691825}, | ||
| keywords = {behavioral economics,cross-cultural research,cultural psychology,culture,evolutionary psychology,experiments,external validity,generalizability,human universals,population variability}, | ||
| pmid = {20550733}, | ||
| title = {{The weirdest people in the world?}}, | ||
| year = {2010}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{Burton2005, | ||
| abstract = {Liberation Social Psychology (la psicologia social de la liberacion, LSP) has developed amongst a body of psychologists in Latin America over the last decade. There has been no survey of the field in English, although some of the ideas are of relevance for those working with oppressed groups elsewhere in the world. This article explores the context in which LSP grew from the work of Ignacio Martin-Baro and was developed by Maritza Montero, amongst others. Within LSP, key concepts emerge, including 'conscientization', 'realismo-critico', 'de-ideologization', a social orientation, 'the preferential option for the oppressed majorities' and methodological eclecticism. The application of LSP is explored with reference to three domains. First, it is suggested that community social psychology as practised in some parts of Latin America reflects LSP in its emphasis on social transformation and participatory methods. Second, psycho-social work with victims of state oppression, which adopts a highly social and societal orientation embodies LSP. Third, social analyses which explicitly adopt socio-psychological-political analyses of the social realities confronting countries in Latin America embrace, in different ways, principles and concepts of LSE Some of the challenges facing LSP are discussed and open dialogue is encouraged between LSP and critical, community and applied social psychologists. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.}, | ||
| author = {Mark Burton and Carolyn Kagan}, | ||
| doi = {10.1002/casp.786}, | ||
| journal = {Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology}, | ||
| month = {jan}, | ||
| title = {{Liberation Social Psychology: Learning From Latin America Psychology of liberation: Learning from Latin America}}, | ||
| volume = {15}, | ||
| year = {2005}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Book{Ellacuria2013, | ||
| author = {Ignacio Ellacuria}, | ||
| city = {Ossining, NY}, | ||
| editor = {Michael L. Lee}, | ||
| publisher = {Orbis Books}, | ||
| title = {Ignacio Ellacuria: Essays on History, Liberation, and Salvation}, | ||
| year = {2013}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Report{CP10KeyMessages2022, | ||
| author = {{End Violence Against Children} and {End Corporal Punishment}}, | ||
| title = {Corporal Punishment – 10 key messages}, | ||
| year = {2022}, | ||
| url = {https://www.end-violence.org/}, | ||
| type = {report}, | ||
| institution = {{E}nd {C}orporal {P}unishment}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{Gershoff2016, | ||
| abstract = {Whether spanking is helpful or harmful to children continues to be the source of considerable debate among both researchers and the public. This article addresses 2 persistent issues, namely whether effect sizes for spanking are distinct from those for physical abuse, and whether effect sizes for spanking are robust to study design differences. Meta-analyses focused specifically on spanking were conducted on a total of 111 unique effect sizes representing 160,927 children. Thirteen of 17 mean effect sizes were significantly different from zero and all indicated a link between spanking and increased risk for detrimental child outcomes. Effect sizes did not substantially differ between spanking and physical abuse or by study design characteristics. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}, | ||
| author = {Elizabeth T. Gershoff and Andrew Grogan-Kaylor}, | ||
| doi = {10.1037/fam0000191}, | ||
| isbn = {0893-3200}, | ||
| issn = {19391293}, | ||
| issue = {4}, | ||
| journal = {Journal of Family Psychology}, | ||
| keywords = {Discipline,Meta-analysis,Physical punishment,Spanking}, | ||
| pages = {453-469}, | ||
| pmid = {27055181}, | ||
| title = {Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses}, | ||
| volume = {30}, | ||
| year = {2016}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @InCollection{Martin-Baro1994B, | ||
| author = {Ignacio Martin-Baro}, | ||
| city = {Cambridge, MA}, | ||
| editor = {Adrianne Aron and Shawn Corne}, | ||
| booktitle = {Writings for a liberation psychology}, | ||
| publisher = {Harvard University Press}, | ||
| title = {Toward A Liberation Psychology}, | ||
| year = {1994}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @InCollection{Martin-Baro1998, | ||
| address = {Madrid, Spain}, | ||
| author = {Ignacio Martin-Baro}, | ||
| booktitle = {Psicolog\'ia de la liberaci\'on}, | ||
| chapter = {Part 2; Ch}, | ||
| editor = {A. Blanco}, | ||
| publisher = {Trotta}, | ||
| title = {{Retos y perspectivas de la psicología latinoamericana}}, | ||
| year = {1998}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{Pye2011, | ||
| author = {Eveline Pye}, | ||
| title = {{E}veline {P}ye: Poetry in numbers, by {J}ulian {C}hampkin}, | ||
| journal = {Significance}, | ||
| volume = {8}, | ||
| number = {3}, | ||
| pages = {127-130}, | ||
| doi = {10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00510.x}, | ||
| url = {https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00510.x}, | ||
| eprint = {https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00510.x}, | ||
| abstract = {Statistics is dry, practical, unimaginative? Unpoetical? Too many people think so. Is there poetry in numbers? Julian Champkin talks to Eveline Pye, statistician and poet of statistics, to disprove it.}, | ||
| year = {2011}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @InCollection{Rich1984, | ||
| abstract = {The Fact of a Doorframe: Poems Selected and New 1950-1984 (New York: Norton, 1984) }, | ||
| author = {Adrienne Rich}, | ||
| city = {New York, NY}, | ||
| publisher = {Norton}, | ||
| title = {Transcendental Etude}, | ||
| booktitle = {The Fact of a Doorframe: Poems Selected and New 1950-1984 }, | ||
| year = {1984}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{StewartTufescu2023, | ||
| abstract = {Globally, corporal punishment is the most common form of violence against children. A large body of evidence demonstrates that it has no positive long-term outcomes and predicts a wide range of adverse effects in childhood and adulthood. The United Nations has declared that corporal punishment violates children’s fundamental rights to protection and has called on all countries to repeal laws that allow or justify it. As of June 2023, 65 countries have prohibited corporal punishment of children in all settings. These laws were implemented to make it clear that no level of violence against children is allowed and to uphold children’s rights to protection. This article aims to: (1) summarize the research and human rights rationales for the prohibition of corporal punishment; (2) provide a global update on its legal status; and (3) present research findings from Sweden, Germany, and New Zealand, three countries that have banned corporal punishment.}, | ||
| author = {Ashley Stewart-Tufescu}, | ||
| issue = {1}, | ||
| journal = {The Canadian Journal of Children's Rights / Revue Canadienne des Droits des Enfants}, | ||
| title = {Corporal Punishment: The Global Picture}, | ||
| volume = {10}, | ||
| year = {2023}, | ||
| doi = {10.22215/cjcr.v10i1}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Report{UNICEF2017, | ||
| author = {{UNICEF}}, | ||
| city = {New York, NY}, | ||
| institution = {UNICEF}, | ||
| title = {A Familiar Face: Violence in the Lives of Children and Adolescents}, | ||
| year = {2017}, | ||
| type = {report}, | ||
| institution = {UNICEF}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{Ward2022LCA, | ||
| author = {Kaitlin P. Ward and Shawna J. Lee and Andrew C. Grogan-Kaylor and Julie Ma and Garrett T. Pace}, | ||
| doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105606}, | ||
| journal = {Child Abuse & Neglect}, | ||
| title = {Patterns of Caregiver Aggressive and Nonaggressive Discipline Toward Young Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Latent Class Approach}, | ||
| volume = {128}, | ||
| year = {2022}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{Ward2023, | ||
| abstract = {Objective: To test associations between 11 parental discipline behaviors and child aggression, distraction, and prosocial peer relations across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). | ||
| Study Design: Data came from the fourth (2009-2013) and fifth (2012-2017) rounds of the UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS). Survey responses publicly available as of July 2020 were included. Data were restricted to household respondents with focal children under 5 years. The final analytic sample included 163,345 respondents across 60 LMICs. Data were analyzed using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression. | ||
| Results: Verbal reasoning (80%) and shouting (66%) were the most common parental discipline behaviors toward young children. Psychological and physical aggression were associated with higher child aggression and distraction. Verbal reasoning was associated with lower aggression (OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.86, 0.99]) and higher prosocial peer relations (OR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.20, 1.42]). Taking away privileges was associated with higher distraction (OR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.03, 1.15] and lower prosocial peer relations (OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.87, 0.98]). Giving the child something else to do was associated with higher distraction (OR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.01, 1.12]. Random slopes suggested statistically credible cultural variation in the associations between parenting behaviors and child socio-emotional outcomes. | ||
| Conclusions: Psychological and physical aggression were disadvantageous for children’s socio-emotional development across countries. Only verbal reasoning was associated with positive child socio-emotional development. Greater emphasis should be dedicated to reducing parental use of psychological and physical aggression across cultural contexts.}, | ||
| author = {Kaitlin P. Ward and Andrew C. Grogan-Kaylor and Julie Ma and Garrett Pace and Shawna J. Lee}, | ||
| journal = {BMJ Open}, | ||
| title = {Associations Between 11 Parental Discipline Behaviors and Child Outcomes Across 60 Countries}, | ||
| year = {2023}, | ||
| doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058439}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Article{Wiest2007, | ||
| abstract = {In this article, we argue that many adults lack the ?numeracy? needed to function in a maximally effective manner in their vocational, civic, and personal lives. We believe schools need to foster skills in quantitative literacy (QL), an inclination and ability to make reasoned decisions using general world knowledge and fundamental mathematics in authentic everyday circumstances. We explain how schools might begin to make inroads in preparing more quantitatively literate students and how this goal coincides with efforts toward greater social justice.}, | ||
| author = {Lynda R Wiest and Heidi J Higgins and Janet Hart Frost}, | ||
| doi = {10.1080/10665680601079894}, | ||
| issn = {1066-5684}, | ||
| issue = {1}, | ||
| journal = {Equity & Excellence in Education}, | ||
| month = {4}, | ||
| note = {doi: 10.1080/10665680601079894}, | ||
| pages = {47-55}, | ||
| publisher = {Routledge}, | ||
| title = {Quantitative Literacy for Social Justice}, | ||
| volume = {40}, | ||
| url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680601079894}, | ||
| year = {2007}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Report{WHO2020, | ||
| author = {{World Health Organization}}, | ||
| city = {Geneva, Switzerland}, | ||
| institution = {{World Health Organization}}, | ||
| title = {Global Status Report On Preventing Violence Against Children 2020}, | ||
| year = {2020}, | ||
| url = {https://www.unicef.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/Global-status-report-on-preventing-violence-against-children-2020.pdf}, | ||
| type = {report}, | ||
| institution = {{World Health Organization}}, | ||
| } |