How many decimal places are used in abstracts? Code for paper in F1000: "Missing the point: are journals using the ideal number of decimal places?", published here: https://f1000research.com/articles/7-450/.
The key files are:
-
make.data.R
, finds eligible articles from specified journal lists, then reads the abstracts from Pubmed and calculates the number of decimal places making a dataset ready for analysis. -
Analysis.Ready.RData
,Analysis.Ready.xlsx
andAnalysis.Ready.txt
, the main dataset for analysis produced bymake.data.R
in R, Excel and tab-delimited format, respectively. -
decimal.places.stats.Rmd
, Rmarkdown file to create the analyses shown in the paper. Was run using R version 3.4.4. -
MultinomialCIsBayes.R
, calculates multinomial Dirichlet confidence intervals for the three categories of percents (too few, just right, too many) using WinBUGS. Requires WinBUGS (version 1.4) and the R package R2WinBUGS. -
decimalplaces.R
, calculates the number of decimal places and significant figures. -
journal.meta.txt
&journal.meta.ii.txt
, tab-delimited lists of the eligible articles searched for percents. Split into two because of the time needed to make the data.journal.meta.RData
&journal.meta.ii.RData
are R-data versions of same.
The code requires the following R packages:
- diagram
- R2WinBUGS
- rentrez
- stringr
- XML
To replicate the results in the paper, use: decimal.places.stats.Rmd
combined with Multi.results.RData
and Analysis.Ready.RData
. If Multi.results.RData
does not exist, it will be created by the Rmarkdown code.
To recreate the entire analysis data set use: make.data.R
optionally combined with journal.meta.RData
and journal.meta.ii.RData
to skip the step to create the lists of papers.
Archived data and code as at time of initial publication (version 1.0): http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1213574 and after comments from peer reviewers (version 1.1): http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1300056.