♻️ split ImportTransactionsModal into smaller component files #3552
Conversation
actual-github-bot
bot
changed the title
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new React functional components related to the transaction import functionality in the desktop client. Key components include Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for actualbudget ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Bundle Stats — desktop-clientHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger
Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
Bundle Stats — loot-coreHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset No files were changed View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger No assets were bigger Smaller No assets were smaller Unchanged
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/SubLabel.jsx (2)
6-12: LGTM: Well-structured component with a minor suggestion.The
SubLabelcomponent is well-implemented and follows React best practices. It's a focused, single-responsibility component that should be easy to use and maintain.Consider adding PropTypes or TypeScript type checking for the
titleprop to improve code robustness and documentation. For example:import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; // ... component code ... SubLabel.propTypes = { title: PropTypes.string.isRequired, };Or if you're planning to migrate to TypeScript soon:
interface SubLabelProps { title: string; } export function SubLabel({ title }: SubLabelProps) { // ... component code ... }
1-12: Great job on component extraction, aligning well with PR objectives.This new
SubLabelcomponent is a good example of breaking down theImportTransactionsModalinto smaller, more manageable pieces. This approach will indeed facilitate the migration to TypeScript by making each component simpler and more focused.A few points to consider for future development:
- As you proceed with creating more such components, maintain consistency in naming conventions and file structure.
- Consider creating a shared styles object or using CSS modules if you find yourself duplicating styles across these new smaller components.
- When you begin the TypeScript migration, start with these smaller components as they will be easier to type and test.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/SelectField.jsx (2)
5-12: Component declaration looks good. Consider adding prop validation.The
SelectFieldcomponent is correctly declared as a named export function with appropriate props. To enhance robustness and maintainability, consider adding prop-types for validation.You could add prop-types as follows:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; // ... component code ... SelectField.propTypes = { style: PropTypes.object, options: PropTypes.array.isRequired, value: PropTypes.string, onChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired, hasHeaderRow: PropTypes.bool, firstTransaction: PropTypes.object };
13-28: Logic is correct. Consider minor optimization for options generation.The component logic is well-structured and correctly implements the desired functionality. The conditional rendering for option labels and the default value logic are appropriate.
Consider simplifying the options generation logic for better readability:
<Select options={[ { value: 'choose-field', label: 'Choose field...' }, ...options.map(option => ({ value: option, label: hasHeaderRow ? option : `Column ${parseInt(option) + 1} (${firstTransaction[option]})` })) ]} value={value ?? 'choose-field'} onChange={onChange} style={style} />This suggestion uses object notation for options, which is more explicit, and the nullish coalescing operator (
??) for the default value.packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/ParsedDate.jsx (1)
8-14: Consider adding prop types for better type checking.The component logic looks good and handles the date parsing and formatting correctly. However, to improve code quality and catch potential errors early, consider adding PropTypes or migrating to TypeScript for this component.
Example with PropTypes:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; // ... component code ... ParsedDate.propTypes = { parseDateFormat: PropTypes.string, dateFormat: PropTypes.string.isRequired, date: PropTypes.string };packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/MultiplierOption.jsx (1)
14-32: LGTM: Render logic is correct and follows React best practices.The component's render logic is well-implemented, using props correctly and applying conditional rendering for the Input field.
Consider moving the inline styles to a separate styles object for improved readability:
const styles = { container: { flexDirection: 'row', gap: 10, height: 28 }, input: { display: multiplierEnabled ? 'inherit' : 'none' } }; return ( <View style={styles.container}> {/* ... */} <Input type="text" style={styles.input} {/* ... */} /> </View> );packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/InOutOption.jsx (2)
8-14: Consider adding prop types for better type checking.The component declaration and props look good. However, to improve code quality and catch potential issues early, consider adding prop types. This will provide better documentation and runtime type checking.
You can add prop types like this:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; // ... component code ... InOutOption.propTypes = { inOutMode: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, outValue: PropTypes.string.isRequired, disabled: PropTypes.bool, onToggle: PropTypes.func.isRequired, onChangeText: PropTypes.func.isRequired, };
27-34: Consider applying thedisabledprop to the Input component.The component's functionality is well implemented. However, the
disabledprop is only applied to theCheckboxOptionand not to theInputcomponent. For consistency, consider applying it to both.You can modify the
Inputcomponent like this:<Input type="text" value={outValue} onChangeValue={onChangeText} placeholder="Value for out rows, i.e. Credit" disabled={disabled} // Add this line />This ensures that both the checkbox and input field are disabled when the
disabledprop is true.packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/FieldMappings.jsx (3)
27-79: LGTM: Well-structured rendering logic with a minor suggestion.The main rendering logic is well-implemented, using reusable components and consistent patterns across different fields. The
onChangehandlers are correctly set up to update the parent component's state.For consistency, consider extracting the repeated
SelectFieldlogic into a separate component or helper function. This would reduce code duplication and make future changes easier. For example:const FieldMapping = ({ title, field, options, mappings, onChange, hasHeaderRow, firstTransaction }) => ( <View style={{ flex: 1 }}> <SubLabel title={title} /> <SelectField options={options} value={mappings[field]} style={{ marginRight: 5 }} onChange={name => onChange(field, name)} hasHeaderRow={hasHeaderRow} firstTransaction={firstTransaction} /> </View> ); // Usage: <FieldMapping title="Date" field="date" options={options} mappings={mappings} onChange={onChange} hasHeaderRow={hasHeaderRow} firstTransaction={transactions[0]} />This would make the main render function more concise and easier to maintain.
80-103: LGTM: Conditional rendering for split mode is well-implemented.The conditional rendering for split mode is correctly implemented, using React fragments and adjusting flex values appropriately.
For consistency with the main fields and to improve maintainability, consider using the same
FieldMappingcomponent suggested earlier. This would make the code more uniform and easier to update. For example:{splitMode ? ( <> <FieldMapping title="Outflow" field="outflow" options={options} mappings={mappings} onChange={onChange} hasHeaderRow={hasHeaderRow} firstTransaction={transactions[0]} style={{ flex: 0.5 }} /> <FieldMapping title="Inflow" field="inflow" options={options} mappings={mappings} onChange={onChange} hasHeaderRow={hasHeaderRow} firstTransaction={transactions[0]} style={{ flex: 0.5 }} /> </> ) : ( // ... existing else block )}This change would make the split mode rendering consistent with the main fields while maintaining the different flex values.
104-131: LGTM: Conditional rendering for in/out mode and amount field is well-implemented.The conditional rendering for in/out mode and the amount field is correctly implemented, with appropriate use of nested conditions.
To improve consistency and readability, consider the following suggestions:
- Use the
FieldMappingcomponent suggested earlier for all fields in this section.- Consider extracting the conditional logic for
inOutModeto a separate variable for improved readability.Here's an example of how you could refactor this section:
const showInOutField = !splitMode && inOutMode; return ( <View> {/* ... previous code ... */} {splitMode ? ( // ... split mode fields ... ) : ( <> {showInOutField && ( <FieldMapping title="In/Out" field="inOut" options={options} mappings={mappings} onChange={onChange} hasHeaderRow={hasHeaderRow} firstTransaction={transactions[0]} /> )} <FieldMapping title="Amount" field="amount" options={options} mappings={mappings} onChange={onChange} hasHeaderRow={hasHeaderRow} firstTransaction={transactions[0]} /> </> )} </View> );This refactoring would make the code more consistent across all field renderings and improve readability by extracting the conditional logic.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/utils.js (1)
1-1: Optimize imports by selecting only the required functions from 'date-fns'.Importing the entire 'date-fns' library can unnecessarily increase the bundle size. Since only
parseISOandisValidare used, consider importing them directly to optimize the application.Apply this change to import only the necessary functions:
- import * as d from 'date-fns'; + import { parseISO, isValid } from 'date-fns';packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/Transaction.jsx (2)
167-173: Avoid redundant 'includes' checks by caching the resultYou are calling
categoryList.includes(transaction.category)twice in lines 167-173. Consider storing the result in a variable to avoid redundant computations and improve readability.
227-228: Ensure 'amount' is correctly checked for null or undefinedThe conditional check
amount === null(line 227) will not catchundefinedvalues. Ifamountcan beundefined, consider usingamount == nullto check for bothnullandundefined.packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/ImportTransactionsModal.jsx (1)
Line range hint
136-147: Fix incorrect use ofreturninsideforEachThe
parseCategoryFieldsfunction usesArray.forEachwithreturnstatements inside the callback. However,returninside aforEachcallback does not exit the outer function or break the loop; it only exits the current iteration. This means thereturn null;inside the callback does not behave as intended.To fix this, consider using a regular
for...ofloop to allow early exit withreturn.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-function parseCategoryFields(trans, categories) { - let match = null; - categories.forEach(category => { - if (category.id === trans.category) { - return null; - } - if (category.name === trans.category) { - match = category.id; - } - }); - return match; -} +function parseCategoryFields(trans, categories) { + for (let category of categories) { + if (category.id === trans.category) { + return null; + } + if (category.name === trans.category) { + return category.id; + } + } + return null; +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
upcoming-release-notes/3552.mdis excluded by!**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/CheckboxOption.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/DateFormatSelect.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/FieldMappings.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/ImportTransactionsModal.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/InOutOption.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/MultiplierOption.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/ParsedDate.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/SelectField.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/SubLabel.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/Transaction.jsx (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/utils.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/DateFormatSelect.jsx
[error] 22-22: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/utils.js
[error] 83-83: The default clause should be the last switch clause.
The following case clause is here:
Regardless its position, the default clause is always executed when there is no match. To avoid confusion, the default clause should be the last switch clause.
(lint/suspicious/useDefaultSwitchClauseLast)
[error] 84-88: Useless case clause.
because the default clause is present:
Unsafe fix: Remove the useless case.
(lint/complexity/noUselessSwitchCase)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/SubLabel.jsx (1)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly structured and include all necessary dependencies for the component. The use of the
themefor styling and theTextcomponent for rendering aligns well with the component's purpose.packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/SelectField.jsx (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are correct and properly structured.The necessary imports for React and the Select component are present and correctly structured.
1-29: Well-structured component that aligns with PR objectives.This
SelectFieldcomponent is a well-implemented, focused piece of theImportTransactionsModal. Its creation as a separate file aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of splitting the larger component to facilitate TypeScript migration. The component maintains the existing functionality while improving code organization.packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/ParsedDate.jsx (2)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are correctly structured and necessary.The imports are well-organized and include all the required dependencies for the component.
1-30: Overall assessment: Good component extraction, with room for minor improvements.This new
ParsedDatecomponent successfully encapsulates the date parsing and formatting logic, aligning well with the PR's objective of splitting theImportTransactionsModalinto smaller, more manageable components. This separation will indeed facilitate easier migration to TypeScript in the future.The component is focused and has a single responsibility, which is excellent for maintainability. However, there are a few areas where it could be improved:
- Adding prop types or migrating to TypeScript for better type checking.
- Simplifying the component structure by reducing nested
Textcomponents.- Extracting inline styles for better organization.
These improvements will further enhance the component's readability and maintainability without changing its core functionality.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/MultiplierOption.jsx (3)
1-6: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and appropriate.The import statements are logically ordered and include all necessary dependencies for the component. No unused imports are present.
8-13: LGTM: Component definition is well-structured.The
MultiplierOptioncomponent is correctly defined as a functional component with clear and descriptive prop names. The use of destructuring for props is a good practice.
1-32: Great job on splitting out the MultiplierOption component!This new component is well-structured, focused, and aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of breaking down the ImportTransactionsModal into smaller, more manageable pieces. The code is clean, follows React best practices, and will be easier to maintain and migrate to TypeScript in the future.
The component's single responsibility and clear interface (through props) contribute to a more modular architecture, which is excellent groundwork for the planned TypeScript migration.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/CheckboxOption.jsx (3)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. The use of relative paths indicates a structured project layout, which is good for maintainability.
7-14: LGTM: Well-structured component with appropriate props.The
CheckboxOptioncomponent is well-defined with a clear set of props. The use of destructuring in the function parameters enhances readability. The inclusion of astyleprop allows for flexible customization from parent components.
1-43: LGTM: Well-implemented component that aligns with PR objectives.This
CheckboxOptioncomponent is a well-structured, focused piece of theImportTransactionsModal. Its creation as a separate file aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of splitting the modal into smaller, more manageable components to facilitate TypeScript migration.The component follows React best practices, is reusable, and maintains a clear separation of concerns. While there are minor suggestions for styling improvements, the overall implementation is solid and contributes positively to the codebase's maintainability.
Great job on this refactoring effort!
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/InOutOption.jsx (2)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are correctly structured, importing React and necessary components from their respective locations. The use of relative imports for local components is a good practice.
1-37: Overall, the component is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives.The
InOutOptioncomponent is a good example of splitting larger components into smaller, more manageable pieces. It follows React best practices and implements the required functionality correctly. The suggestions provided (adding prop types, moving styles, and consistent prop usage) are minor improvements that can enhance code quality and maintainability.This implementation aligns well with the PR objective of facilitating the migration to TypeScript by breaking down the
ImportTransactionsModalinto smaller component files.packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/DateFormatSelect.jsx (3)
1-7: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and relevant.The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and there are no unused imports. The use of relative imports suggests a well-organized project structure.
9-14: LGTM: Function declaration follows best practices.The component name is descriptive, and the use of object destructuring for props is a good practice. The props seem relevant to the component's purpose.
1-39: Summary: Well-structured component that aligns with PR objectives.This new
DateFormatSelectcomponent is a well-implemented, focused React component that contributes to the PR's goal of splitting theImportTransactionsModalinto smaller, more manageable pieces. This approach will indeed facilitate the future migration to TypeScript.The component follows React best practices and has a single, clear responsibility. With the suggested minor improvements, it will be even more robust and flexible.
Great job on this refactoring effort!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 22-22: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/FieldMappings.jsx (2)
1-17: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the component declaration follows React best practices by using a functional component with props destructuring.
1-132: Overall assessment: Well-structured component with minor improvement suggestions.The
FieldMappingscomponent is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives of splitting theImportTransactionsModalinto smaller, more manageable component files. The component effectively handles the rendering of field mapping options for CSV import functionality.Key points:
- The component structure is logical and follows React best practices.
- Conditional rendering is used appropriately for different modes (split and in/out).
- The code is generally consistent and maintainable.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Enhance robustness in data handling, particularly for edge cases.
- Extract repeated
SelectFieldlogic into a separate component for better consistency and maintainability.- Consider minor refactoring for improved readability in conditional rendering sections.
These suggestions aim to further improve the code quality without introducing functional changes, in line with the PR's objectives.
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/Transaction.jsx (1)
95-95: Verify the necessity of disabling 'rulesdir/typography' ESLint ruleThe comments disabling
eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/typography(lines 95 and 110) suggest that typography linting rules are being bypassed. Ensure that this is necessary and does not mask any potential issues.Also applies to: 110-110
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/ParsedDate.jsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/CheckboxOption.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/InOutOption.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/DateFormatSelect.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/DateFormatSelect.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/utils.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/Transaction.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/Transaction.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/Transaction.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/desktop-client/src/components/modals/ImportTransactionsModal/Transaction.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Good refactor suggestions from the bot, but I will ignore them here. The intention is to only rearrange things and not perform refactors in this PR. |
MatissJanis
changed the title
Move file settings to the file management area
Migrating massive files to TypeScript is hard. Splitting up
ImportTransactionsModalinto one-component-per-file to help with the migration.This PR has no other functional changes. It's exactly the same code as before except split in multiple files.