Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ECO-5002] Fix usePresence won't leave presence if unmount triggered during channel attaching #1884

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

VeskeR
Copy link
Contributor

@VeskeR VeskeR commented Oct 4, 2024

This fixes a race condition issue, where a React app might trigger a component unmount while channel is still in the attaching state, thus presence.leave was never called for a channel and member would remain there until app reload.

Partially fixes https://ably.atlassian.net/browse/ECO-5002, see more context in the internal slack thread.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved logic for leaving presence, ensuring it only occurs under specific channel states ('attached' or 'attaching') and when the connection is active.
  • Documentation
    • Updated comments for clarity on conditions affecting presence status.

…nel attaching

This fixes a race condition issue, where a React app might trigger a
component unmount while channel is still in the `attaching` state, thus
`presence.leave` was never called for a channel and member would remain
there until app reload.
@VeskeR VeskeR requested a review from ttypic October 4, 2024 08:28
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the usePresence hook within the src/platform/react-hooks/src/hooks/usePresence.ts file. The modifications enhance the cleanup function's logic for leaving presence, refining the conditions under which this occurs. The hook now checks for both 'attached' and 'attaching' channel states, as well as ensuring the connection is not in any inactive states. Comments have been updated for clarity, while the core functionality of the hook remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/platform/react-hooks/src/hooks/usePresence.ts Updated cleanup logic for leaving presence to include 'attaching' state and clarified connection state checks. Comments revised for clarity.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the realm of hooks, a change so bright,
Presence now checks both day and night.
'Attaching' joins 'attached' in the dance,
Leaving with care, we give it a chance.
With clearer comments, the code's now a delight,
Hopping through states, everything feels right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 458c1ca and 6151a9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/platform/react-hooks/src/hooks/usePresence.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/platform/react-hooks/src/hooks/usePresence.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-95: Overall assessment: Good fix with room for further improvements

The changes effectively address the race condition described in the PR objectives. By including the 'attaching' state in the channel state check, the hook now correctly handles the scenario where a component unmounts during channel attachment.

However, there are a few additional considerations:

  1. Error Handling: Consider adding error handling around the channel.presence.leave() call. Although we're checking states, unexpected errors could still occur.

  2. Testing: Ensure that unit tests are updated or added to cover this new behavior, especially the edge case of unmounting during channel attachment.

  3. Documentation: Update the hook's documentation to reflect this change in behavior, particularly noting that it now handles unmounting during channel attachment.

  4. Performance: While the current implementation is correct, frequently checking connection and channel states might impact performance in high-frequency update scenarios. Consider implementing a memoization strategy if this becomes an issue.

  5. Consistency: Ensure that this change is consistently applied across other similar hooks or components that deal with presence.

To further improve the robustness of this hook, consider implementing a state machine pattern for managing the lifecycle of presence. This could provide a more structured approach to handling various states and transitions, making the code more maintainable and easier to reason about as complexity grows.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for similar patterns:

This will help identify if similar changes need to be applied elsewhere in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful: No additional instances of presence.leave found in production code.

The usage of channel.presence.leave() in usePresence.ts is consistent, and no other instances were found in the production codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar presence leave patterns in other files
rg --type typescript 'presence\.leave' -C 5

Length of output: 80


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar presence leave patterns in other TypeScript files
rg 'presence\.leave' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -C 5

Length of output: 2584

Copy link
Collaborator

@ttypic ttypic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@VeskeR VeskeR merged commit 5bfb32f into main Oct 4, 2024
14 checks passed
@VeskeR VeskeR deleted the ECO-5002/fix-usePresence-channel-name-race-condition branch October 4, 2024 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants