feat: OkHttp implementation for making HTTP calls and WebSocket connections #1035
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new module, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/features
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/javadoc
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
network-client-okhttp/gradle.properties (1)
1-4: LGTM with a minor suggestion for improvement.The Gradle properties for the
network-client-okhttpmodule are well-defined and consistent with the PR objectives. The artifact ID, name, and packaging are appropriate for the module.Consider expanding the
POM_DESCRIPTIONto provide more specific information about the OkHttp implementation:-POM_DESCRIPTION=Default implementation for HTTP client +POM_DESCRIPTION=Default implementation of HTTP client and WebSocket connections using OkHttpThis change would more accurately reflect the module's capabilities, including both HTTP and WebSocket functionality.
network-client-okhttp/build.gradle.kts (2)
7-10: Consider using a more recent Java version.The Java compatibility is set to version 1.8, which ensures broad compatibility. However, for a new module, you might want to consider using a more recent Java version to leverage newer language features and performance improvements.
If possible, consider upgrading to a newer Java version (e.g., Java 11 or 17) for this module. This could be done by updating the version:
java { - sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_1_8 - targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_1_8 + sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11 + targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11 }
12-15: LGTM: Dependencies are correctly specified.The dependencies section is well-structured:
- The dependency on
:network-client-coreis appropriate for extending core networking functionality.- Using OkHttp is a good choice for implementing HTTP and WebSocket functionality.
Consider specifying the API dependency type for OkHttp if you're only using its public API:
dependencies { implementation(project(":network-client-core")) - implementation(libs.okhttp) + api(libs.okhttp) }This change would make the OkHttp API available to consumers of your library without them needing to declare a direct dependency on OkHttp.
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.java (1)
4-7: LGTM:createmethod implementation is correct.The
createmethod correctly implements the factory pattern, creating and returning a newOkHttpWebSocketEngineinstance with the provided configuration.Consider adding a null check for the
configparameter to prevent potentialNullPointerExceptions:@Override public WebSocketEngine create(WebSocketEngineConfig config) { + if (config == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("WebSocketEngineConfig cannot be null"); + } return new OkHttpWebSocketEngine(config); }network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngineFactory.java (2)
6-11: LGTM:createmethod implementation is correct. Consider adding error handling.The
createmethod correctly implements the factory pattern for creatingHttpEngineinstances. It properly uses theOkHttpClient.Builderand injects proxy settings using a utility method.Consider adding error handling or parameter validation for the
configobject to make the method more robust. For example:@Override public HttpEngine create(HttpEngineConfig config) { + if (config == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("HttpEngineConfig cannot be null"); + } OkHttpClient.Builder connectionBuilder = new OkHttpClient.Builder(); OkHttpUtils.injectProxySetting(config.getProxy(), connectionBuilder); return new OkHttpEngine(connectionBuilder.build(), config); }
1-17: Overall implementation looks good. Consider adding JavaDoc comments.The
OkHttpEngineFactoryclass is well-implemented, correctly following the factory pattern and providing a clean way to create OkHttp-based HTTP engines. The code is concise and easy to understand.To improve documentation, consider adding JavaDoc comments to the class and its methods. This will enhance code readability and provide better context for developers using this class. For example:
/** * A factory for creating OkHttp-based HTTP engines. * This class implements the HttpEngineFactory interface to provide * OkHttp-specific HTTP engine instances. */ public class OkHttpEngineFactory implements HttpEngineFactory { /** * Creates a new HttpEngine instance configured with OkHttp. * * @param config The configuration for the HTTP engine. * @return A new OkHttpEngine instance. * @throws IllegalArgumentException if config is null. */ @Override public HttpEngine create(HttpEngineConfig config) { // ... existing implementation ... } /** * Returns the type of this engine factory. * * @return EngineType.OKHTTP */ @Override public EngineType getEngineType() { // ... existing implementation ... } }network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java (2)
9-11: Consider adding a null check for theconfigparameter.The constructor correctly initializes the
configfield, but it doesn't validate the input. To prevent potentialNullPointerExceptions later in the code, consider adding a null check.Here's a suggested implementation:
public OkHttpWebSocketEngine(WebSocketEngineConfig config) { + if (config == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("WebSocketEngineConfig cannot be null"); + } this.config = config; }
13-26: Consider adding exception handling.The
createmethod doesn't handle any exceptions that might occur during the setup process, such asIllegalArgumentExceptionfor invalid URLs orSSLExceptionfor SSL configuration issues. Consider wrapping the method body in a try-catch block and throwing a more specific exception that aligns with theWebSocketEngineinterface.Here's a suggested implementation:
@Override public WebSocketClient create(String url, WebSocketListener listener) { + try { OkHttpClient.Builder connectionBuilder = new OkHttpClient.Builder(); Request.Builder requestBuilder = new Request.Builder().url(url); OkHttpUtils.injectProxySetting(config.getProxy(), connectionBuilder); if (config.getSslSocketFactory() != null) { connectionBuilder.sslSocketFactory(config.getSslSocketFactory()); } return new OkHttpWebSocketClient(connectionBuilder.build(), requestBuilder.build(), listener); + } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) { + throw new WebSocketException("Invalid URL: " + url, e); + } catch (Exception e) { + throw new WebSocketException("Failed to create WebSocket client", e); + } }network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpCall.java (1)
19-39: LGTM: Well-implementedexecute()method with robust error handling.The
execute()method is well-implemented:
- It correctly converts the OkHttp
Responseto the expectedHttpResponseformat.- The use of try-with-resources ensures proper resource management.
- Exception handling is appropriate, distinguishing between connection-related issues and other IOExceptions.
- Null checks for response body and content type are good practices.
Consider extracting the
HttpResponsebuilding logic into a separate private method for better readability and maintainability. For example:private HttpResponse buildHttpResponse(Response response) throws IOException { return HttpResponse.builder() .headers(response.headers().toMultimap()) .code(response.code()) .message(response.message()) .body( response.body() != null && response.body().contentType() != null ? new HttpBody(response.body().contentType().toString(), response.body().bytes()) : null ) .build(); }Then, you can simplify the
execute()method:@Override public HttpResponse execute() { try (Response response = call.execute()) { return buildHttpResponse(response); } catch (ConnectException | SocketTimeoutException | UnknownHostException | NoRouteToHostException fce) { throw new FailedConnectionException(fce); } catch (IOException ioe) { throw new RuntimeException(ioe); } }network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpUtils.java (2)
30-50: LGTM: Well-implemented conversion method with minor improvement suggestions.The
toOkhttpRequestmethod effectively converts a customHttpRequestto an OkHttpRequest. It correctly handles the URL, method, body, and headers.Some minor suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding null checks for the
requestparameter and its components (url, method) to prevent NullPointerExceptions.- You might want to handle potential exceptions when parsing the content type.
Here's a suggested improvement:
public static Request toOkhttpRequest(HttpRequest request) { + if (request == null || request.getUrl() == null || request.getMethod() == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Request, URL, and method must not be null"); + } Request.Builder builder = new Request.Builder() .url(request.getUrl()); RequestBody body = null; if (request.getBody() != null) { - body = RequestBody.create(request.getBody().getContent(), MediaType.parse(request.getBody().getContentType())); + MediaType mediaType = null; + try { + mediaType = MediaType.parse(request.getBody().getContentType()); + } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) { + // Log the error or use a default media type + } + body = RequestBody.create(request.getBody().getContent(), mediaType); } builder.method(request.getMethod(), body); for (Map.Entry<String, List<String>> entry : request.getHeaders().entrySet()) { String headerName = entry.getKey(); List<String> values = entry.getValue(); for (String headerValue : values) { builder.addHeader(headerName, headerValue); } } return builder.build(); }These changes add null checks and handle potential exceptions when parsing the content type, making the method more robust.
1-51: Overall, good implementation with some areas for improvement.The
OkHttpUtilsclass provides useful utility methods for working with the OkHttp library. Here's a summary of the review:
The
injectProxySettingmethod has a critical logical error that needs to be fixed. Additionally, consider implementing support for different proxy types and authentication methods.The
toOkhttpRequestmethod is well-implemented but could benefit from additional null checks and exception handling for improved robustness.The overall structure and organization of the class are good, with clear separation of concerns between the two main methods.
Please address the issues in
injectProxySettingand consider implementing the suggested improvements for both methods to enhance the overall quality and reliability of this utility class.network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketClient.java (1)
10-19: LGTM: Fields and constructor are well-structured.The use of final fields for dependencies is a good practice. The constructor properly initializes all final fields, and the
webSocketfield is correctly left mutable for later initialization.Consider adding JavaDoc comments for the class and constructor to improve code documentation:
/** * OkHttp implementation of the WebSocketClient interface. */ public class OkHttpWebSocketClient implements WebSocketClient { // ... fields ... /** * Constructs an OkHttpWebSocketClient with the specified OkHttpClient, Request, and WebSocketListener. * * @param connection The OkHttpClient to use for the WebSocket connection. * @param request The Request object containing the WebSocket URL and headers. * @param listener The WebSocketListener to handle WebSocket events. */ public OkHttpWebSocketClient(OkHttpClient connection, Request request, WebSocketListener listener) { // ... constructor body ... } }gradle/libs.versions.toml (1)
42-42: LGTM: OkHttp library declared correctlyThe OkHttp library is correctly declared with the proper group, name, and version reference.
Consider adding OkHttp to the
commonbundle if it's going to be used across multiple modules:[bundles] -common = ["msgpack", "vcdiff-core"] +common = ["msgpack", "vcdiff-core", "okhttp"]This would make it easier to include OkHttp in multiple build files with a single reference.
README.md (3)
503-517: LGTM! Consider adding a version check recommendation.The new section provides clear instructions for adding the OkHttp dependency for proxy support. This is a valuable addition to the README.
Consider adding a note recommending users to check for the latest version of the
network-client-okhttpdependency, as library versions may change over time.
525-562: LGTM! Comprehensive example for proxy configuration.The Java example provided is clear, well-commented, and covers both REST and Realtime client configurations. It also includes optional proxy authentication, which is valuable for users with authenticated proxies.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining that users should replace the placeholder values (e.g., "your-proxy-host", "your-username") with their actual proxy details. This will help prevent confusion for less experienced users.
564-572: LGTM! Useful additional resources provided.The additional resources section provides relevant links that will be helpful for users seeking more information about the Ably SDK, OkHttp, and proxy servers in general.
Consider adding a link to Ably's documentation specifically about proxy configuration, if such a page exists. This would provide users with more Ably-specific information about using proxies with the SDK.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml (2 hunks)
- network-client-default/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/gradle.properties (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpCall.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngineFactory.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpUtils.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketClient.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.java (1 hunks)
- settings.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (26)
settings.gradle.kts (1)
16-16: LGTM: New module added successfully.The addition of the "network-client-okhttp" module is in line with the PR objectives to implement OkHttp for HTTP calls and WebSocket connections. The placement of the new module is logical and consistent with the existing structure.
Let's verify if there are corresponding build files for the new module:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Build configuration file exists for "network-client-okhttp".
The presence ofbuild.gradle.ktsin thenetwork-client-okhttpmodule ensures proper build setup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the existence of build files for the new module # Test: Check if build.gradle.kts exists for the new module fd -t f "build.gradle.kts" network-client-okhttp # Test: Check if build.gradle exists for the new module (in case Groovy DSL is used) fd -t f "build.gradle" network-client-okhttp # If neither file is found, it might indicate missing build configurationLength of output: 171
network-client-default/build.gradle.kts (1)
13-13: Verify impact of dependency scope change on consumer modulesThe change from
apitoimplementationfor thenetwork-client-coredependency improves encapsulation and potentially build performance. However, it may break existing code in modules that depend onnetwork-client-defaultif they were directly using classes fromnetwork-client-core.Please run the following script to identify potential issues:
This change enhances modularity but may require updates in consumer modules. Please review the script output and update any affected modules to directly depend on
network-client-coreif necessary.Consider documenting this architectural change in the project's changelog or migration guide, as it may require action from developers using this module.
✅ Verification successful
Dependency scope change verified and safe
The change from
apitoimplementationfor thenetwork-client-coredependency does not affect any consumer modules. No additional dependencies onnetwork-client-corewere found outside thenetwork-client-defaultmodule.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of network-client-core classes in other modules # Find all Java and Kotlin files outside the network-client-core and network-client-default directories files=$(fd -e java -e kt . --exclude 'network-client-core' --exclude 'network-client-default') # Search for imports of network-client-core classes in these files echo "Checking for imports of network-client-core classes in other modules:" rg "import.*network\.client\.core" $files # If any results are found, they will be displayed above echo "If any results are shown above, those files may need to be updated to directly depend on network-client-core."Length of output: 23655
network-client-okhttp/build.gradle.kts (1)
1-5: LGTM: Appropriate plugins are applied.The plugins section is well-structured:
- The
java-libraryplugin is correctly applied for a library project.- Using aliases for Lombok and Maven Publish plugins is a good practice for version management.
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.java (3)
1-3: LGTM: Class structure and package declaration are appropriate.The
OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactoryclass is well-structured and correctly implements theWebSocketEngineFactoryinterface. The naming convention clearly indicates its purpose, and the package declaration is consistent with the file path.
9-12: LGTM:getEngineTypemethod implementation is correct and concise.The
getEngineTypemethod correctly returns the appropriateEngineType.OKHTTPvalue, adhering to the interface contract.
1-13: Overall, excellent implementation ofOkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.The class successfully implements the
WebSocketEngineFactoryinterface for OkHttp, providing clean and concise methods for creating WebSocket engines and identifying the engine type. The code is well-structured and easy to understand, making it a solid addition to theio.ably.lib.networkpackage.A minor suggestion was made to add a null check in the
createmethod, but otherwise, the implementation is robust and follows good coding practices.network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngineFactory.java (2)
1-5: LGTM: Class structure and package declaration are correct.The
OkHttpEngineFactoryclass is properly structured, implements theHttpEngineFactoryinterface, and is in the correct package. The import statement forOkHttpClientis appropriate for its usage.
13-16: LGTM:getEngineTypemethod is correctly implemented.The
getEngineTypemethod properly overrides the interface method and returns the correct engine type (EngineType.OKHTTP). The implementation is simple and effective.network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java (2)
1-7: LGTM: Class structure and imports are well-defined.The class structure is appropriate for implementing a WebSocket engine using OkHttp. The use of a configuration object (
WebSocketEngineConfig) allows for flexible setup, which is a good practice. The imports are correctly specified and relevant to the class functionality.
13-26: LGTM: Thecreatemethod is well-implemented.The method correctly sets up the OkHttpClient with the provided configuration, including proxy settings and SSL socket factory. The use of builder pattern for both OkHttpClient and Request is a good practice.
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngine.java (4)
1-7: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements are concise and relevant to the class functionality. Good job on keeping the imports clean and focused.
8-16: LGTM: Class declaration and fields are well-structured.The
OkHttpEngineclass correctly implements theHttpEngineinterface. The private final fieldsclientandconfigare appropriately encapsulated. The constructor properly initializes these fields.
28-31: LGTM:isUsingProxymethod is correctly implemented.The
isUsingProxymethod is simple and effective. It correctly checks theconfigobject to determine if a proxy is being used.
1-32: Overall, the OkHttpEngine implementation is solid with room for minor improvements.The
OkHttpEngineclass provides a good implementation of theHttpEngineinterface using the OkHttp library. The code is well-structured and follows good practices such as proper encapsulation and use of utility methods.Key points:
- The import statements and class structure are clean and appropriate.
- The
isUsingProxymethod is correctly implemented.- The
callmethod is functional but could benefit from optimization and error handling as suggested in the previous comment.Consider implementing the suggested improvements to enhance the robustness and efficiency of the
callmethod. Otherwise, the implementation is sound and ready for use.network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpCall.java (4)
1-10: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports are well-organized and include all necessary classes for the implementation. There are no unused imports.
12-17: LGTM: Class structure is well-designed.The
OkHttpCallclass has a good structure:
- It implements the
HttpCallinterface, promoting loose coupling.- It uses dependency injection through the constructor, which is a good practice for testability and flexibility.
- The
callfield is correctly marked asprivate final, ensuring encapsulation and immutability.
41-44: LGTM: Simple and correctcancel()method implementation.The
cancel()method is implemented correctly:
- It properly delegates the cancellation to the underlying OkHttp
Callobject.- The implementation is simple and straightforward, which is appropriate for this method.
1-45: Overall, excellent implementation ofOkHttpCall.The
OkHttpCallclass provides a solid implementation of theHttpCallinterface using the OkHttp library. Key strengths include:
- Good class structure with proper interface implementation and dependency injection.
- Robust error handling in the
execute()method.- Correct use of try-with-resources for proper resource management.
- Appropriate null checks and exception handling.
The implementation successfully bridges the gap between the
HttpCallinterface and the OkHttp library, providing the necessary functionality for making HTTP calls in the Ably SDK.network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpUtils.java (2)
1-14: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and concise.The import statements are well-organized and include all necessary classes for the functionality provided by this utility class.
16-28:⚠️ Potential issueFix logical error and consider improvements in proxy configuration.
There are several issues and potential improvements in this method:
- There's a logical error in the first condition check. It should return if
proxyConfigis null, not if it's not null.- The proxy type is hardcoded to HTTP. Consider allowing different proxy types.
- The method doesn't handle cases where the proxy authentication type is not BASIC.
Here's a suggested improvement:
public static void injectProxySetting(ProxyConfig proxyConfig, OkHttpClient.Builder connectionBuilder) { - if (proxyConfig != null) return; + if (proxyConfig == null) return; - connectionBuilder.proxy(new Proxy(Proxy.Type.HTTP, new InetSocketAddress(proxyConfig.getHost(), proxyConfig.getPort()))); + Proxy.Type proxyType = proxyConfig.getType() != null ? proxyConfig.getType() : Proxy.Type.HTTP; + connectionBuilder.proxy(new Proxy(proxyType, new InetSocketAddress(proxyConfig.getHost(), proxyConfig.getPort()))); - if (proxyConfig.getUsername() == null || proxyConfig.getAuthType() != ProxyAuthType.BASIC) return; + if (proxyConfig.getUsername() == null) return; + switch (proxyConfig.getAuthType()) { + case BASIC: String username = proxyConfig.getUsername(); String password = proxyConfig.getPassword(); connectionBuilder.proxyAuthenticator((route, response) -> { @@ -25,6 +27,9 @@ public static void injectProxySetting(ProxyConfig proxyConfig, OkHttpClient.Buil .header("Proxy-Authorization", credential) .build(); }); + break; + // Add cases for other authentication types if needed + } }This improvement fixes the logical error, allows for different proxy types, and provides a structure to handle different authentication types in the future.
To ensure that the
ProxyConfigclass has the necessary methods and fields, please run the following script:network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketClient.java (3)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and class declaration look good.The imports are appropriate for the OkHttp WebSocket implementation, and the class structure follows Java conventions. The
OkHttpWebSocketClientimplementing theWebSocketClientinterface indicates good design practices, allowing for potential alternative implementations.
42-50: LGTM: Send methods are implemented correctly.The
sendmethods for both byte arrays and strings are implemented correctly, using the appropriate WebSocket send methods. The use ofByteString.of(bytes)for sending byte arrays is an efficient approach.
1-85: Overall, excellent implementation of OkHttpWebSocketClient.The
OkHttpWebSocketClientclass provides a robust and well-structured implementation of theWebSocketClientinterface using the OkHttp library. The code follows good practices, such as immutability where possible, proper event delegation, and correct use of the OkHttp WebSocket API.The suggested improvements, including enhanced documentation, slight modification to the
cancelmethod, and more detailed error handling, are minor and can be easily incorporated to further enhance the quality of the implementation.Great job on creating a solid foundation for WebSocket communication in the Ably SDK!
gradle/libs.versions.toml (1)
20-20: LGTM: OkHttp version added correctlyThe addition of OkHttp version 4.12.0 is appropriate. This is the latest stable version, which is a good choice for new implementations.
README.md (2)
519-523: LGTM! Clear explanation of proxy configuration.This segment effectively explains how to configure proxy settings using the ClientOptions object after adding the OkHttp dependency. The information is accurate and well-connected to the previous step.
503-572: Excellent addition to the README!The new section on using the Ably SDK under a proxy is a valuable addition to the documentation. It provides clear instructions, a comprehensive example, and relevant resources. This information will be particularly useful for users working in restricted network environments.
The structure and content of the new section align well with the rest of the README, maintaining consistency in style and depth of information.
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngine.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketClient.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketClient.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ttypic
force-pushed
the
ECO-4208/proxy-support-okhttp
branch
from
e53b6e7 to
30b7385
Compare
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/features
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/javadoc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
network-client-core/gradle.properties (1)
1-4: LGTM! Consider enhancing the POM_DESCRIPTION.The Gradle properties file is well-structured and contains appropriate values for the network-client-core module. The artifact ID, name, and packaging type are correctly specified.
Consider expanding the
POM_DESCRIPTIONto provide more detailed information about the module's purpose and functionality. This could help differentiate it from thePOM_NAMEand offer more context to developers. For example:POM_ARTIFACT_ID=network-client-core POM_NAME=Core HTTP client abstraction -POM_DESCRIPTION=Core HTTP client abstraction +POM_DESCRIPTION=Core abstraction layer for HTTP client implementations, providing a unified interface for making HTTP requests and WebSocket connections POM_PACKAGING=jarnetwork-client-core/build.gradle.kts (1)
1-4: LGTM! Consider adding publication configuration.The addition of the Maven Publish plugin is appropriate for this library module. It aligns with the PR objectives by enabling the publication of the enhanced network client core, which now includes expanded proxy support.
To fully utilize the Maven Publish plugin, consider adding a
publishingblock to configure the publication details. For example:publishing { publications { create<MavenPublication>("maven") { from(components["java"]) groupId = "com.your.group" artifactId = "network-client-core" version = "1.0.0" // Or use a version variable } } }This configuration will ensure that when you publish, the artifact details are correctly set.
README.md (2)
515-515: Ensure consistency in version numbers across the README.The version number for the OkHttp dependency (1.2.43) is different from the version mentioned in the installation section (1.2.42). Consider updating all version references to ensure consistency throughout the document.
563-563: Consider adding troubleshooting information for proxy usage.While the instructions for setting up proxy configuration are clear, it might be helpful to include some common troubleshooting steps or potential issues users might encounter when using the SDK behind a proxy. This could help users quickly resolve any problems they face during implementation.
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (1)
64-64: Improve Method Naming ConventionThe method
isSupportPingListener()might be better namedsupportsPingListener()to adhere to standard Java naming conventions for boolean methods. This enhances readability and makes the code more intuitive.Consider renaming the method:
- params.heartbeats = !this.webSocketEngine.isSupportPingListener(); + params.heartbeats = !this.webSocketEngine.supportsPingListener();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml (2 hunks)
- lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (4 hunks)
- network-client-core/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- network-client-core/gradle.properties (1 hunks)
- network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngineFactory.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-default/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- network-client-default/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/DefaultWebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/gradle.properties (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpCall.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngineFactory.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpUtils.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketClient.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.java (1 hunks)
- settings.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml
- network-client-default/build.gradle.kts
- network-client-okhttp/build.gradle.kts
- network-client-okhttp/gradle.properties
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpCall.java
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngine.java
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpEngineFactory.java
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpUtils.java
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketClient.java
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.java
- settings.gradle.kts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ast-grep
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java
[warning] 79-79: 'An insecure SSL context was detected. TLS versions 1.0, 1.1, and all
SSL versions are considered weak encryption and are deprecated. Use
SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2") for the best security.'
Context: SSLContext.getInstance("TLS")
Note: [CWE-326] Inadequate Encryption Strength [REFERENCES]
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7568
- https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-02.html
🔇 Additional comments (8)
network-client-default/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/DefaultWebSocketEngine.java (1)
21-24: New method added to support ping listener functionality.The
isSupportPingListener()method has been added to theDefaultWebSocketEngineclass, implementing theWebSocketEngineinterface. This method always returnstrue, indicating that this WebSocket engine supports ping listener functionality.Consider the following points:
- The method name follows the Java naming convention for boolean methods (starts with "is").
- The implementation is straightforward and consistent.
- This addition might impact how ping operations are handled in the WebSocket communication.
To ensure this change is consistent with the interface and other implementations, let's verify the
WebSocketEngineinterface and check for other implementations:✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete: No Issues Found
The
isSupportPingListener()method inDefaultWebSocketEnginecorrectly implements theWebSocketEngineinterface and is consistent with other implementations. No issues detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify WebSocketEngine interface and its implementations # Check the WebSocketEngine interface echo "Checking WebSocketEngine interface:" rg --type java -A 5 "interface WebSocketEngine" # Find other implementations of WebSocketEngine echo "Finding other WebSocketEngine implementations:" rg --type java -A 5 "class \w+ implements WebSocketEngine"Length of output: 4471
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java (4)
1-11: LGTM: Class declaration and constructor are well-implemented.The class structure is appropriate, implementing the
WebSocketEngineinterface. The use of a final field for configuration ensures immutability, which is a good practice. The constructor correctly initializes the configuration.
13-26: LGTM: Thecreatemethod is well-implemented.The method correctly sets up the OkHttpClient and Request, applies proxy settings, and conditionally sets the SSL socket factory. This implementation provides the necessary flexibility for different configurations.
28-31: Verify if lack of ping listener support is intentional.The
isSupportPingListenermethod always returnsfalse, indicating that this WebSocket engine does not support a ping listener. Please confirm if this is intentional or if ping support should be implemented.
19-19: Verify the implementation ofOkHttpUtils.injectProxySetting.A previous review comment highlighted a potential logical error in the
injectProxySettingmethod. Please ensure that this method is correctly implemented to apply proxy settings when a validproxyConfigis provided.Run the following script to verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
OkHttpUtils.injectProxySettingis correctly implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of OkHttpUtils.injectProxySetting # Test: Search for the method implementation rg -A 10 'void injectProxySetting' network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpUtils.javaLength of output: 877
network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngineFactory.java (1)
19-19: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The class name change from "OkWebSocketEngineFactory" to "OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory" aligns with the PR objective of implementing OkHttp for WebSocket connections. This change provides more clarity about the underlying implementation.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
Consider adding a comment explaining the use of reflection here. For example:
// Use reflection to load the OkHttp WebSocket engine factory if available Class<?> okWebSocketFactoryClass = Class.forName("io.ably.lib.network.OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory");This would improve code maintainability by clarifying the purpose of this reflection-based approach.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful!
The class
OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactoryhas been correctly renamed and all references toOkWebSocketEngineFactoryhave been updated across the codebase. No inconsistencies or leftover references were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the class name change consistency and usage # Check if the new class exists echo "Checking for the new OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory class:" fd --type f --extension java OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.java # Search for any remaining references to the old class name echo "Searching for any remaining references to OkWebSocketEngineFactory:" rg --type java "OkWebSocketEngineFactory" # Search for usages of the new class name echo "Searching for usages of OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory:" rg --type java "OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory"Length of output: 991
README.md (1)
503-563: LGTM: Clear and comprehensive instructions for proxy configuration.The new section on using the Ably SDK under a proxy is well-structured and provides clear instructions. The Java example is comprehensive and demonstrates both REST and Realtime usage, which is helpful for users.
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (1)
63-67: Good Refactoring for Code MaintainabilityExtracting the WebSocket engine creation into a separate method
createWebSocketEngineenhances code organization and readability. This refactoring simplifies the constructor and promotes better maintainability.
network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngine.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngineFactory.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/features
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
build.gradle.kts (1)
10-10: LGTM. Consider documenting the purpose of the test retry plugin.The addition of the
test.retryplugin is a good choice for a network-focused project, as it can help manage flaky tests often associated with network operations. This aligns well with the PR's focus on implementing OkHttp for HTTP and WebSocket connections.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this plugin and how it should be used in subprojects. This will help other developers understand its intended use in the context of your project.
.github/workflows/integration-test.yml (3)
52-65: LGTM! Consider adding an artifact upload step.The new
check-rest-okhttpjob is well-structured and consistent with the existing jobs. The use of the-Pokhttpflag aligns with the PR objectives to implement OkHttp for HTTP calls.Consider adding an artifact upload step similar to the
check-restjob for consistency and to preserve build reports:- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 if: always() with: name: java-build-reports-rest-okhttp path: java/build/reports/
67-80: LGTM! Consider adding an artifact upload step.The new
check-realtime-okhttpjob is well-structured and consistent with the existing jobs. The use of the-Pokhttpflag aligns with the PR objectives to implement OkHttp for WebSocket connections.Consider adding an artifact upload step similar to the
check-realtimejob for consistency and to preserve build reports:- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 if: always() with: name: java-build-reports-realtime-okhttp path: java/build/reports/
52-80: Great job on maintaining consistency across jobs!The new
check-rest-okhttpandcheck-realtime-okhttpjobs are well-aligned with the existing jobs in terms of structure and setup. This consistency is excellent for maintainability.As the number of jobs increases, you might want to consider parallelizing them or using a matrix strategy if build times become an issue. This could potentially reduce the overall workflow execution time.
Also, ensure that adding these new jobs doesn't significantly increase the total CI time, which could impact developer productivity. Monitor the workflow execution times and optimize if necessary.
java/build.gradle.kts (3)
24-28: LGTM: Flexible network client configurationThe conditional logic for including either the default or OkHttp-based network client is a good approach. It allows for flexible configuration and gradual adoption of the new OkHttp implementation.
Consider adding a comment explaining how to enable the OkHttp client, for example:
// To use the OkHttp client, set the "okhttp" property when running Gradle // e.g., ./gradlew build -Pokhttp if (findProperty("okhttp") == null) { runtimeOnly(project(":network-client-default")) } else { runtimeOnly(project(":network-client-okhttp")) }This will make it easier for developers to understand how to switch between implementations.
67-72: LGTM: Retry configuration for testRealtimeSuiteThe addition of retry logic to the testRealtimeSuite task is a good improvement. It will help manage potentially flaky tests, which is particularly important for network-related tests like WebSocket connections.
Consider adding a comment explaining the retry strategy:
retry { // Retry up to 2 times, allowing a maximum of 4 failures // Don't fail if a test passes or is skipped after a retry maxRetries.set(2) maxFailures.set(4) failOnPassedAfterRetry.set(false) failOnSkippedAfterRetry.set(false) }This will help other developers understand the rationale behind these settings.
86-91: LGTM: Retry configuration for testRestSuiteThe addition of retry logic to the testRestSuite task is consistent with the testRealtimeSuite task, which is good. However, there's an opportunity to reduce code duplication here.
Consider refactoring the retry configuration into a separate function:
fun Test.addRetryConfig() { retry { maxRetries.set(2) maxFailures.set(4) failOnPassedAfterRetry.set(false) failOnSkippedAfterRetry.set(false) } } tasks.register<Test>("testRealtimeSuite") { // ... other configurations ... addRetryConfig() } tasks.register<Test>("testRestSuite") { // ... other configurations ... addRetryConfig() }This refactoring will make it easier to maintain consistent retry configurations across different test tasks.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/integration-test.yml (1 hunks)
- build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml (3 hunks)
- java/build.gradle.kts (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
java/build.gradle.kts (2)
6-6: LGTM: Test retry plugin addedThe addition of the test retry plugin is a good improvement. It will help manage flaky tests and improve the reliability of the CI/CD pipeline, which is especially important when dealing with network-related tests like those for HTTP and WebSocket connections.
Line range hint
1-91: Overall assessment: Well-structured changes that align with PR objectivesThe modifications to
build.gradle.ktseffectively support the implementation of OkHttp for HTTP calls and WebSocket connections, while also enhancing the testing framework. The changes include:
- Addition of the test retry plugin
- Flexible configuration for network client implementation
- Retry configurations for both Realtime and REST test suites
These changes contribute positively to the project's goals of expanding proxy support and improving test reliability. The suggestions provided in the review comments, if implemented, will further enhance code clarity and maintainability.
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/features
ttypic
force-pushed
the
ECO-4208/proxy-support-okhttp
branch
from
9661a9c to
0718012
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
android/src/androidTest/java/io/ably/lib/test/RetryTestRule.java (1)
8-13: Consider improving field name and comment clarity.The implementation looks good, but there are a couple of suggestions for improvement:
The field name
timesToRunTestCountcould be more descriptive. Consider renaming it tomaxAttemptsormaxExecutionsto better reflect its purpose.The comment could be more explicit. Consider updating it to:
/** * Represents the maximum number of times a test will be executed. * If the constructor parameter 'times' is 0, this will be set to 1, * meaning the test will run once without retries. */These changes would enhance the readability and maintainability of the code.
android/src/androidTest/java/io/ably/lib/test/android/AndroidPushTest.java (3)
Line range hint
1-1004: Consider refactoring long test methodsSome test methods in this file are quite long and complex. For example, the
push_activate()method starting at line 183 is over 100 lines long. Consider refactoring these methods into smaller, more focused test cases or extracting common setup code into helper methods. This would improve readability and maintainability of the tests.
Line range hint
365-367: Review and enable or remove commented-out testThere's a commented-out test case (RSH3a2a) with a note about an issue (#739). Consider reviewing this test, and either enable it if the issue has been resolved, or remove it if it's no longer relevant. Keeping commented-out code can lead to confusion and clutter in the long run.
Line range hint
8-8: Update deprecated Android test runnerThe file is using
android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnit4, which is part of the deprecated Android Support Library. Consider updating to the AndroidX test libraries and usingandroidx.test.ext.junit.runners.AndroidJUnit4instead. This will ensure better compatibility with newer Android versions and access to the latest testing features.
🛑 Comments failed to post (3)
android/src/androidTest/java/io/ably/lib/test/RetryTestRule.java (3)
14-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider clarifying constructor logic.
The constructors are well-implemented, but the logic in the parameterized constructor could be more explicit:
public RetryTestRule(int times) { this.timesToRunTestCount = Math.max(1, times + 1); }This change ensures that
timesToRunTestCountis always at least 1, making the logic more robust and eliminating the need for the comment abouttimes = 0.
22-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the
applymethod.The current implementation of the
applymethod is correct, but it can be simplified:@Override public Statement apply(Statement base, Description description) { return new Statement() { @Override public void evaluate() throws Throwable { // ... (rest of the logic from the current `statement` method) } }; }This change eliminates the need for the separate
statementmethod, making the code more concise and easier to follow.
27-51:
⚠️ Potential issueFix string interpolation and improve error messages.
The retry logic is well-implemented, but there are a few issues to address:
- The error messages use string interpolation syntax that's not valid in Java. Use String.format() or StringBuilder instead.
- The variable
runCountis not defined. Use the loop variableiinstead.- The error messages could be more informative.
Here's a suggested improvement:
private Statement statement(Statement base, Description description) { return new Statement() { @Override public void evaluate() throws Throwable { Throwable latestException = null; for (int i = 0; i < timesToRunTestCount; i++) { try { base.evaluate(); return; } catch (Throwable t) { latestException = t; System.err.println(String.format("%s: test failed on attempt %d of %d", description.getMethodName(), i + 1, timesToRunTestCount)); t.printStackTrace(); } } if (latestException != null) { System.err.println(String.format("%s: giving up after %d attempts", description.getDisplayName(), timesToRunTestCount)); throw latestException; } } }; }These changes correct the string interpolation issues, use the correct variables, and provide more precise error messages.
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/features
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1035/features
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (1)
177-185: LGTM with a suggestion: Method to disable activity checks for testingThe
turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupportedmethod provides a useful way to disable activity checks for specific test scenarios. This can be valuable for testing edge cases and ensuring proper behavior under various conditions.Consider adding a safeguard to ensure this method is only called in test environments:
protected void turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupported() { + if (!isTestEnvironment()) { + Log.w(TAG, "Attempting to turn off activity check in non-test environment"); + return; + } if (!webSocketEngine.isPingListenerSupported()) activityCheckTurnedOff = true; } + private boolean isTestEnvironment() { + // Implement logic to determine if running in a test environment + // For example, checking for a specific system property or environment variable + }This addition would prevent accidental usage in production environments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (6 hunks)
- lib/src/test/java/io/ably/lib/test/util/MockWebsocketFactory.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-default/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/DefaultWebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngine.java
- network-client-default/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/DefaultWebSocketEngine.java
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (1)
Learnt from: ttypic PR: ably/ably-java#1035 File: lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java:110-110 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T10:38:33.504Z Learning: In the `WebSocketTransport` constructor, synchronization is not necessary when initializing `webSocketClient` because it's not accessed by multiple threads at that point.
🪛 ast-grep
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java
[warning] 80-80: 'An insecure SSL context was detected. TLS versions 1.0, 1.1, and all
SSL versions are considered weak encryption and are deprecated. Use
SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2") for the best security.'
Context: SSLContext.getInstance("TLS")
Note: [CWE-326] Inadequate Encryption Strength [REFERENCES]
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7568
- https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-02.html
🔇 Additional comments (4)
lib/src/test/java/io/ably/lib/test/util/MockWebsocketFactory.java (1)
158-158: Approved, but please provide more context.The addition of
turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupported()seems to be a deliberate change to handle a specific case in the mock WebSocket behavior. This change is likely beneficial for certain test scenarios.However, to ensure clarity and maintainability:
Could you provide more information about the purpose and impact of this change? Specifically:
- What prompted the need for this addition?
- How does it affect the behavior of the mock WebSocket in tests?
Consider adding a comment above this line to explain its purpose and when it's necessary. This will help other developers understand the reasoning behind this call.
To better understand the context of this change, could you run the following command to find where this method is defined and how it's used elsewhere in the codebase?
✅ Verification successful
To gain a clearer understanding of the
turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupportedmethod's role and its usage within the codebase, please execute the following command:
Change Verified Successfully
The addition of
turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupported()inMockWebsocketFactory.javais appropriate and effectively mocks the specific behavior related to activity checks when ping listeners are not supported. This change is localized to the test utilities and does not impact other parts of the codebase.
- No additional usages of the method were found outside the test file and its definition, ensuring no unintended side effects.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition and usage of turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupported rg --type java -e "turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupported" -g "!test"Length of output: 215
Script:
# Search for all usages of turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupported rg --type java -e "turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupported"Length of output: 334
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (3)
21-22: LGTM: New imports for exception handlingThe addition of
KeyManagementExceptionandNoSuchAlgorithmExceptionimports is appropriate for the enhanced SSL/TLS handling in thecreateWebSocketEnginemethod.
54-56: LGTM: New fields for WebSocket engine and activity check controlThe addition of
webSocketEngineandactivityCheckTurnedOfffields supports the new OkHttp implementation and provides flexibility in managing activity checks.
64-66: LGTM: Enhanced constructor with WebSocket engine initializationThe constructor now properly initializes the
webSocketEngineand configures heartbeats based on the engine's capabilities. This change improves the flexibility and maintainability of the WebSocket transport implementation.
ttypic
force-pushed
the
ECO-4208/proxy-support-okhttp
branch
from
f75ca55 to
1d04fc4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
java/build.gradle.kts (2)
24-28: LGTM: Conditional network client dependencyThe conditional logic for including either
:network-client-defaultor:network-client-okhttpis well-implemented. This flexibility aligns with the PR objectives and allows for easy switching between implementations.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this conditional logic for better code readability. For example:
// Choose between default and OkHttp network client implementations // Set the 'okhttp' property to use the OkHttp implementation if (findProperty("okhttp") == null) { runtimeOnly(project(":network-client-default")) } else { runtimeOnly(project(":network-client-okhttp")) }
86-91: LGTM: Retry configuration added to testRestSuiteThe addition of retry configuration to the testRestSuite task is consistent with the changes made to testRealtimeSuite. This ensures uniform behavior across different test suites, which is good for maintaining consistency in the testing process.
To reduce code duplication, consider extracting the retry configuration into a separate function or property that can be reused. For example:
val testRetryConfig: Action<TestRetryTaskExtension> = Action { maxRetries.set(3) maxFailures.set(8) failOnPassedAfterRetry.set(false) failOnSkippedAfterRetry.set(false) } tasks.register<Test>("testRealtimeSuite") { // ... other configurations ... retry(testRetryConfig) } tasks.register<Test>("testRestSuite") { // ... other configurations ... retry(testRetryConfig) }This approach would make it easier to maintain and update the retry configuration for all test tasks.
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (3)
64-67: LGTM: Constructor updated to use centralized WebSocket engine creationThe changes to the constructor improve the initialization process by centralizing the WebSocket engine creation and configuration. This is a good practice for maintainability and flexibility.
Consider adding a comment explaining the logic behind setting
params.heartbeats. For example:// Enable heartbeats if the WebSocket engine doesn't support ping listeners params.heartbeats = !this.webSocketEngine.isPingListenerSupported();This would make the code more self-documenting.
177-185: Approve new activity check control with suggestionsThe addition of
turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupportedand the corresponding change inflagActivityprovide good flexibility for handling different WebSocket implementations, especially for testing scenarios.However, consider the following improvements:
The method name
turnOffActivityCheckIfPingListenerIsNotSupportedis quite long. Consider a shorter name likedisableActivityCheckIfNeeded.Since this method is primarily for testing, consider using the
@VisibleForTestingannotation to make its purpose clearer.In
flagActivity, the condition!activityCheckTurnedOffcould be renamed to something more positive likeactivityCheckEnabledfor better readability.Example:
@VisibleForTesting protected void disableActivityCheckIfNeeded() { activityCheckEnabled = webSocketEngine.isPingListenerSupported(); } // In flagActivity method: if (activityTimerTask == null && connectionManager.maxIdleInterval != 0 && activityCheckEnabled) { // ... existing code ... }These changes would improve code readability and make the testing-related nature of the method more explicit.
Also applies to: 333-333
Line range hint
1-411: Overall assessment: Significant improvements with minor suggestionsThe changes to
WebSocketTransport.javarepresent a substantial improvement in WebSocket handling:
- Centralized WebSocket engine creation and configuration.
- Improved flexibility for different WebSocket implementations.
- Better testability with the new activity check control.
Key suggestions for improvement:
- Enhance TLS security by specifying a minimum version (TLSv1.2).
- Improve naming and documentation for the new activity check control method.
- Add explanatory comments for some of the new logic.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of expanding proxy support and enhancing WebSocket connections. They provide a solid foundation for the new OkHttp implementation while maintaining compatibility with other WebSocket engines.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ast-grep
[warning] 80-80: 'An insecure SSL context was detected. TLS versions 1.0, 1.1, and all
SSL versions are considered weak encryption and are deprecated. Use
SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2") for the best security.'
Context: SSLContext.getInstance("TLS")
Note: [CWE-326] Inadequate Encryption Strength [REFERENCES]
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7568
- https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-02.html
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml (3 hunks)
- java/build.gradle.kts (4 hunks)
- lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (6 hunks)
- lib/src/test/java/io/ably/lib/test/util/MockWebsocketFactory.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-default/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/DefaultWebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- build.gradle.kts
- gradle/libs.versions.toml
- lib/src/test/java/io/ably/lib/test/util/MockWebsocketFactory.java
- network-client-core/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/WebSocketEngine.java
- network-client-default/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/DefaultWebSocketEngine.java
- network-client-okhttp/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/network/OkHttpWebSocketEngine.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (1)
Learnt from: ttypic PR: ably/ably-java#1035 File: lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java:110-110 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T10:38:33.504Z Learning: In the `WebSocketTransport` constructor, synchronization is not necessary when initializing `webSocketClient` because it's not accessed by multiple threads at that point.
🪛 ast-grep
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java
[warning] 80-80: 'An insecure SSL context was detected. TLS versions 1.0, 1.1, and all
SSL versions are considered weak encryption and are deprecated. Use
SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1.2") for the best security.'
Context: SSLContext.getInstance("TLS")
Note: [CWE-326] Inadequate Encryption Strength [REFERENCES]
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7568
- https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-02.html
🔇 Additional comments (5)
java/build.gradle.kts (3)
6-6: LGTM: Test retry plugin addedThe addition of the test retry plugin is a good improvement. It will help handle potentially flaky tests, increasing the overall reliability of the test suite.
67-72: LGTM: Retry configuration added to testRealtimeSuiteThe addition of retry configuration to the testRealtimeSuite task is a good improvement. The settings (max 3 retries, max 8 failures, not failing on passed or skipped tests after retry) are reasonable and will help handle potentially flaky tests, increasing the overall reliability of the test suite.
Line range hint
1-108: Overall assessment: Well-implemented changes to build configurationThe changes to
build.gradle.ktseffectively support the PR objectives by:
- Adding the test retry plugin for improved test reliability.
- Implementing conditional logic for network client selection, allowing for OkHttp integration.
- Configuring retry settings for both Realtime and REST test suites.
These modifications enhance the project's build and test processes, aligning well with the goal of expanding proxy support and implementing OkHttp for HTTP calls and WebSocket connections.
lib/src/main/java/io/ably/lib/transport/WebSocketTransport.java (2)
4-5: LGTM: New imports and fields addedThe new imports and field declarations are appropriate for the changes made in the class. They support the new WebSocket engine management and SSL/TLS handling.
Also applies to: 21-22, 54-56
111-111: LGTM: UpdatedconnectmethodThe change to use
this.webSocketEngine.create()for creating the WebSocket client aligns well with the new centralized WebSocket engine management. The synchronization is correctly maintained, ensuring thread safety.
Resolves #120
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
network-client-okhttpmodule to enhance HTTP and WebSocket connections.Documentation
Chores
network-client-okhttpmodule.