Move error inside RoomLifecycle
#82
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce mock implementations for a chat client system, enhancing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/RoomLifecycle+Error.swift (1)
4-21: LGTM: Well-implemented extension with clear error handling.The
errorcomputed property effectively encodes the constraint that only specific cases (.failedand.suspended) contain an error, aligning with the PR objectives. The implementation is concise and handles all cases of theRoomLifecycleenum correctly.For slightly improved readability, consider using a more concise syntax for the cases that return
nil:extension RoomLifecycle { var error: ARTErrorInfo? { switch self { case let .failed(error), let .suspended(error): return error case .initialized, .attached, .attaching, .detached, .detaching, .releasing, .released: return nil } } }This change combines the
.failedand.suspendedcases, and groups all thenilcases together, making the intent even clearer at a glance.Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/Subscription+RoomStatusChange.swift (2)
4-7: Documentation is clear and informative.The comment effectively explains the purpose and benefits of the extension. It provides a good comparison with alternative approaches, which helps developers understand why this extension is useful.
Consider adding a brief example of how to use these methods in the documentation to further improve clarity.
15-33: Well-implemented filtering methods with room for optimization.The
suspendedElements()andfailedElements()methods are correctly implemented and consistent in their structure. They effectively filter and transform the elements based on their status.Consider extracting the common logic into a private helper method to reduce code duplication. For example:
private func filterElements(for state: (ARTErrorInfo) -> RoomStatus) -> AsyncCompactMapSequence<Subscription<RoomStatusChange>, StatusChangeWithError> { compactMap { statusChange in if case let .some(error) = statusChange.current.associatedError(for: state) { StatusChangeWithError(statusChange: statusChange, error: error) } else { nil } } } func suspendedElements() async -> AsyncCompactMapSequence<Subscription<RoomStatusChange>, StatusChangeWithError> { filterElements(for: RoomStatus.suspended) } func failedElements() async -> AsyncCompactMapSequence<Subscription<RoomStatusChange>, StatusChangeWithError> { filterElements(for: RoomStatus.failed) }This approach would make it easier to add new filtering methods in the future if needed.
Sources/AblyChat/RoomStatus.swift (1)
106-106: Remove unusederrorproperty inDefaultRoomStatusThe
errorproperty inDefaultRoomStatusis no longer used after the removal of theerrorfromRoomStatusandRoomStatusChange. You can safely remove this property to clean up the code:-internal private(set) var error: ARTErrorInfo?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (5 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomStatus.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/RoomLifecycle+Error.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/Subscription+RoomStatusChange.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (11 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel.swift:98-102 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:43:27.683Z Learning: The cleanup of old subscriptions in `MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel` is acknowledged with a TODO comment and is tracked in issue #36.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel.swift:98-102 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: The cleanup of old subscriptions in `MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel` is acknowledged with a TODO comment and is tracked in issue #36.Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (4)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-09-18T18:34:37.252Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:217-220 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:44:34.032Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of missing `stateChange.reason` when `stateChange.resumed` is `false` is being tracked in issue #74. Future reviews should be aware of this planned work.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:217-220 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of missing `stateChange.reason` when `stateChange.resumed` is `false` is being tracked in issue #74. Future reviews should be aware of this planned work.Sources/AblyChat/RoomStatus.swift (2)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#77 File: Sources/AblyChat/Room.swift:14-14 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T21:58:50.246Z Learning: In the codebase, the term `status` now has a new meaning, and its usage is intentional.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#77 File: Sources/AblyChat/Room.swift:14-14 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In the codebase, the term `status` now has a new meaning, and its usage is intentional.Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (10)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335 Timestamp: 2024-09-23T19:56:39.435Z Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T12:55:21.968Z Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:941-941 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:46:16.467Z Learning: When a TODO comment references an existing GitHub issue, it's acceptable to leave it in the code without requesting its removal.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:941-941 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: When a TODO comment references an existing GitHub issue, it's acceptable to leave it in the code without requesting its removal.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:836-836 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: Before suggesting the removal of TODO comments, check if they reference existing GitHub issues that track the pending work.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:836-836 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:46:04.461Z Learning: Before suggesting the removal of TODO comments, check if they reference existing GitHub issues that track the pending work.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:499-504 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T12:47:28.179Z Learning: In test closures, parameters like `callCount` may be used to track invocation counts correctly across invocations.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:499-504 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In test closures, parameters like `callCount` may be used to track invocation counts correctly across invocations.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/RoomLifecycle+Error.swift (1)
1-2: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements for
AblyandAblyChatare relevant to the context of this file.Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/Subscription+RoomStatusChange.swift (2)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements for
AblyandAblyChatare relevant and necessary for the functionality implemented in this file.
7-13: Well-structured struct and extension declarations.The
StatusChangeWithErrorstruct is appropriately defined within theSubscriptionextension. The struct properties are well-documented, clearly explaining their purpose and relationship.Sources/AblyChat/RoomStatus.swift (1)
8-15:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
ARTErrorInfoconforms toEquatableYou've added
Equatableconformance toRoomLifecycleand introduced associated values of typeARTErrorInfoin thesuspendedandfailedcases. ForRoomLifecycleto conform toEquatable, all associated values must also conform toEquatable. Please ensure thatARTErrorInfoconforms toEquatable, or provide a custom implementation ofEquatableforRoomLifecycle.Verify if
ARTErrorInfoconforms toEquatableby checking its declaration:Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (1)
415-415: LGTMThe addition of the
.suspended(error: .createUnknownError())state in thecreateSubscriptionmethod appropriately simulates an error scenario for room status changes in the mock implementation.Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (5)
265-265: Update state to failed with error reasonThe call to
changeStatus(to: .failed(error: reason))correctly transitions the room lifecycle state to.failedwith the provided error. This ensures that the error is appropriately reflected in the manager's state.
284-284: Update state to suspended with error reasonThe call to
changeStatus(to: .suspended(error: reason))appropriately transitions the state to.suspendedwith the associated error reason. This accurately represents the suspended state due to the encountered error.
297-302: State transition logging and event emissionThe
changeStatusmethod effectively updates thecurrentstate, logs the transition, and emits theRoomStatusChangeevent. Capturing thepreviousstate ensures accurate tracking of state changes.
344-344: Consistent error handling during contributor operationsThe use of
changeStatus(to: .suspended(error: error))andchangeStatus(to: .failed(error: error))ensures consistent state transitions when contributor attach operations fail. This maintains the integrity of the room lifecycle by accurately reflecting the error states.Also applies to: 351-351
451-452: Prevent redundant state transitions to failedThe condition
if !current.isFailedprevents unnecessary state changes when the current state is already.failed. This check ensures thatchangeStatus(to: .failed(error: error))is only called when appropriate, avoiding redundant state updates.
Lifecycle statuses have an error if and only if they have certain cases, so encode this constraint in the type system to avoid unnecessary unwraps. Part of #12.
lawrence-forooghian
force-pushed
the
12-associated-value-RoomLifecycle
branch
from
f496cbb to
d51887c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (1)
Line range hint
1-524: Review and possibly address TODO commentsThere are several TODO comments throughout the file, many of which reference GitHub issues for future work. While it's good that these are being tracked, it might be worth reviewing if any of these TODOs can be addressed in this PR. For those that can't be addressed immediately, consider adding more context or priority to help with future planning.
Some examples of TODOs to review:
- Line 29: Cleanup of old subscriptions (issue Find a way to clean up arrays of subscriptions #36)
- Line 356: Implementing the "asynchronously with respect to CHA-RL1h4" part of CHA-RL1h5 (issue Trigger the
RETRYoperation where spec says to #50)- Line 516: Handling task cancellation (part of issue Decide how our SDK should interact with Swift
Taskcancellation #29)Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (1)
415-415: Clarify the purpose of repeating status entries in the random selectionThe array passed to
randomElement()contains multiple instances of.attachedand.attaching, which skews the probability towards these statuses. If the intention is to simulate more frequent occurrences of these statuses, consider adding a comment to explain this for future maintainability. Alternatively, you might use a weighted random selection method for clearer intent.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (5 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomStatus.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/RoomLifecycle+Error.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/Subscription+RoomStatusChange.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (11 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomStatus.swift
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/RoomLifecycle+Error.swift
- Tests/AblyChatTests/Helpers/Subscription+RoomStatusChange.swift
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel.swift:98-102 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:43:27.683Z Learning: The cleanup of old subscriptions in `MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel` is acknowledged with a TODO comment and is tracked in issue #36.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/Mocks/MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel.swift:98-102 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: The cleanup of old subscriptions in `MockRoomLifecycleContributorChannel` is acknowledged with a TODO comment and is tracked in issue #36.Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (4)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-09-18T18:34:37.252Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:217-220 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:44:34.032Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of missing `stateChange.reason` when `stateChange.resumed` is `false` is being tracked in issue #74. Future reviews should be aware of this planned work.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:217-220 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of missing `stateChange.reason` when `stateChange.resumed` is `false` is being tracked in issue #74. Future reviews should be aware of this planned work.Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (10)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:941-941 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: When a TODO comment references an existing GitHub issue, it's acceptable to leave it in the code without requesting its removal.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:941-941 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:46:16.467Z Learning: When a TODO comment references an existing GitHub issue, it's acceptable to leave it in the code without requesting its removal.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:836-836 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T19:46:04.461Z Learning: Before suggesting the removal of TODO comments, check if they reference existing GitHub issues that track the pending work.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#67 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:836-836 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: Before suggesting the removal of TODO comments, check if they reference existing GitHub issues that track the pending work.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335 Timestamp: 2024-09-23T19:56:39.435Z Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T12:55:21.968Z Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:499-504 Timestamp: 2024-10-01T12:47:28.179Z Learning: In test closures, parameters like `callCount` may be used to track invocation counts correctly across invocations.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:499-504 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z Learning: In test closures, parameters like `callCount` may be used to track invocation counts correctly across invocations.
🔇 Additional comments (16)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (4)
297-303: Improved error handling inchangeStatusmethodThe removal of the separate
errorparameter and the simplification of thechangeStatusmethod is a good improvement. This change encapsulates the error within theRoomLifecycleenum, leading to cleaner and more maintainable code. It also ensures that error states are always associated with the correct lifecycle state.
344-344: Consistent error handling inperformAttachOperationThe updates to the error handling in
performAttachOperationare consistent with the changes made to thechangeStatusmethod. The error is now correctly passed as part of theRoomLifecycleenum, maintaining the new error handling approach throughout the class.Also applies to: 351-351
451-453: Improved state management inperformDetachOperationThe addition of the check
if !current.isFailedbefore changing the status to failed is a good improvement. This change implements the CHA-RL2h2 specification point and prevents unnecessary state changes when the room is already in a failed state. This ensures more consistent and predictable state management.
Line range hint
1-524: Overall improvements in error handling and state managementThe changes in this file significantly improve the error handling and state management of the
RoomLifecycleManagerclass. By moving the error handling inside theRoomLifecycleenum, the code becomes more type-safe and reduces the need for unnecessary unwraps, aligning well with the PR objectives.Key improvements:
- Simplified
changeStatusmethod with encapsulated error handling.- Consistent error handling throughout the file, particularly in
performAttachOperationandperformDetachOperation.- Improved state management to prevent unnecessary state changes.
These changes enhance the overall structure and maintainability of the code, making it easier to reason about the room's lifecycle and error states.
Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (12)
225-225: Approved: Consistent use ofsuspendedElements()The change to use
suspendedElements().first { _ in true }is consistent with similar changes throughout the file. This refactoring likely improves code clarity by using a more specific method for filtering suspended elements.
237-237: Approved: Enhanced suspended state checkThe change to use
manager.current.isSuspendedinstead of comparing directly to.suspendedimproves the test's robustness. This new approach likely handles different variations of the suspended state more accurately.
246-246: Approved: Improved error consistency checkThe addition of
manager.current.errorto the list of checked errors enhances the test's thoroughness. This change ensures that the error is consistent across the status change, the manager's current state, and the thrown error, providing a more comprehensive validation.
276-276: Approved: Consistent use offailedElements()The change to use
failedElements().first { _ in true }aligns with the refactoring pattern seen earlier in the file. This modification likely improves code clarity by using a more specific method for filtering failed elements.
287-287: Approved: Enhanced failed state checkThe change to use
manager.current.isFailedinstead of comparing directly to.failedimproves the test's robustness. This new approach likely handles different variations of the failed state more accurately, enhancing the test's reliability.
296-296: Approved: Consistent error checking across componentsThe addition of
manager.current.errorto the list of checked errors enhances the test's thoroughness and maintains consistency with earlier changes. This modification ensures that the error is uniform across the status change, the manager's current state, and the thrown error, providing a more comprehensive validation.
425-429: Approved: Correct setup for failed state testThe addition of these lines properly initializes the manager in a failed state with an arbitrary error. This setup is crucial for testing the
performDetachOperationbehavior when the manager is in a failed state, aligning well with the test's purpose.
845-845: Approved: Consistent use offailedElements()The change to use
failedElements().first { _ in true }aligns with the refactoring pattern seen throughout the file. This modification improves code consistency and likely enhances clarity by using a more specific method for filtering failed elements.
864-864: Approved: Consistent and enhanced failed state checkThe change to use
manager.current.isFailedinstead of comparing directly to.failedimproves the test's robustness and maintains consistency with earlier changes. This approach likely handles different variations of the failed state more accurately, enhancing the test's reliability.
946-946: Approved: Consistent use ofsuspendedElements()The change to use
suspendedElements().first { _ in true }aligns with the refactoring pattern seen throughout the file. This modification improves code consistency and likely enhances clarity by using a more specific method for filtering suspended elements.
949-954: Approved: Enhanced error propagation and state verificationThese changes improve the test's accuracy by:
- Creating a specific
contributorStateChangeReasonand using it in the state change.- Verifying that this exact error (using
===) is propagated to the room's suspended state.- Checking that the manager's current state is not only suspended but also contains the correct error.
These modifications ensure a more precise and comprehensive test of the error handling and state transition logic.
Also applies to: 962-962, 964-964
Line range hint
1-964: Overall: Consistent improvements in error handling and state verificationThe changes in this file demonstrate a systematic approach to enhancing the
RoomLifecycleManagerTests. Key improvements include:
- Consistent use of specific element filtering methods (e.g.,
suspendedElements(),failedElements()).- More robust state checking using properties like
isSuspendedandisFailed.- Enhanced error propagation verification, ensuring errors are consistent across different components.
- More precise suspended and failed state checks, including verification of associated errors.
These changes collectively improve the tests' accuracy, robustness, and alignment with the specified requirements. The refactoring maintains consistency throughout the file, leading to more readable and maintainable test code.
Lifecycle statuses have an error if and only if they have certain cases, so encode this constraint in the type system to avoid unnecessary unwraps.
Part of #12.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
RoomLifecycleManager, streamlining contributor lifecycle handling.Bug Fixes
Tests
RoomLifecycleManagerto reflect new error handling and state management features, ensuring robustness.