[WIP, ECO-4952] Implement room lifecycle spec #30
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
maratal
reviewed
Aug 28, 2024
maratal
reviewed
Aug 31, 2024
lawrence-forooghian
force-pushed
the
28-implement-room-lifecycle-spec
branch
6 times, most recently
from
d82635e to
280fd4a
Compare
This is based on [1] at aa7455d. It’s generated some questions, which I’ve asked on that PR. I started implementing this as part of #19, before realising that implementing the spec is not the aim of that task. So, putting this work on hold until we pick it up again in #28. So far, only the ATTACH operation is implemented. [1] ably/specification#200 I have since updated with error names @ bcb7390 other stuff done since first version of this commit: - start implementing the low-hanging fruit of DETACH all the infrastructure in place for feature-specific errors used generic type for contributor so that i can access the mock-specific properties of the contributor's channel in the tests without having to create channels and then create contributors from those wip detachment errors further with detachment errors wip trying to see if there aren't 2 status updates Revert "wip trying to see if there aren't 2 status updates" This reverts commit 63dd9b9. Doesn’t work. implement CHA-RL2h2 wip channel detach retry a few updates to older bits implement more of RELEASE comment wip done RELEASE OK, I believe that this is now based on b4a495e of the spec some further comments spec points documentation based on JS rules [1] @ 8c9ce8b, but decided that: - if a test doesn't relate to a spec point, it doesn't need any markers - there should be a way to know that a spec point is tested across multiple tests [1] https://github.com/ably/ably-js/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#tests-alignment-with-the-ably-features-specification
lawrence-forooghian
force-pushed
the
28-implement-room-lifecycle-spec
branch
from
280fd4a to
997dbb8
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP of #28, parked because I realised that I’m meant to be working on #19. But it's here in case people want to see what I’ve been up to.