Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ECO-5149] Implement lifecycle contributor precedence #180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

lawrence-forooghian
Copy link
Collaborator

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian commented Dec 4, 2024

Implements spec points CHA-RC2e and CHA-RL10.

Resolves #153.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling for room features, ensuring clarity when accessing properties without enabled features.
    • Reintroduction of the typing feature in the room feature set.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved initialization process for room contributors, ensuring correct order of feature processing.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test to verify the order of contributors in the DefaultRoom when all features are enabled, enhancing test coverage.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Room protocol and its implementations, enhancing the handling of room features and their dependencies. Notable changes include the introduction of error handling mechanisms for accessing properties without enabled features, updates to the initialization process in DefaultRoom, and the addition of a new static method in RoomFeature. A new test method is also introduced to verify the order of contributors in the RoomLifecycleManager, ensuring compliance with specified requirements.

Changes

File Change Summary
Sources/AblyChat/Room.swift Updated Room protocol and DefaultRoom class; refined feature handling and error management.
Sources/AblyChat/RoomFeature.swift Modified RoomFeature enum to conform to CaseIterable; added method for precedence checking.
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomTests.swift Added lifecycleContributorOrder() test method to validate contributor order in lifecycle.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement lifecycle contributor precedence (#153)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • umair-ably
  • maratal
  • AndyTWF

Poem

In the room where features play,
Order reigns, come what may.
With typing back, and reactions too,
The lifecycle flows, all bright and new.
Errors caught, no more dismay,
Hooray for changes, hip-hip-hooray! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian force-pushed the 153-lifecycle-contributor-precedence branch from 2a697a7 to 90f436b Compare December 4, 2024 19:16
@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian changed the title Add tests for lifecycle contributor precedence Implement lifecycle contributor precedence Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomFeature.swift (1)

4-8: Consider Assigning Explicit Raw Values to Enum Cases

Relying on the order of enum cases for precedence can lead to maintenance issues if the order is changed unintentionally. Assigning explicit raw values to RoomFeature cases will make the precedence explicit and the code more robust.

Apply this diff to assign explicit raw values:

-import Ably

/// The features offered by a chat room.
-internal enum RoomFeature: CaseIterable {
+internal enum RoomFeature: Int, CaseIterable {
    // This list MUST be kept in the same order as the list in CHA-RC2e, in order for the implementation of `areInPrecedenceListOrder` to work.
-   case messages
-   case presence
-   case typing
-   case reactions
-   case occupancy
+   case messages = 0
+   case presence = 1
+   case typing = 2
+   case reactions = 3
+   case occupancy = 4

And update areInPrecedenceListOrder:

/// Returns a `Bool` indicating whether `first` and `second` are in the same order as the list given in CHA-RC2e.
 internal static func areInPrecedenceListOrder(_ first: Self, _ second: Self) -> Bool {
-    let allCases = Self.allCases
-    let indexOfFirst = allCases.firstIndex(of: first)!
-    let indexOfSecond = allCases.firstIndex(of: second)!
-    return indexOfFirst < indexOfSecond
+    return first.rawValue < second.rawValue
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b2bfc0 and 90f436b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Sources/AblyChat/Room.swift (2 hunks)
  • Sources/AblyChat/RoomFeature.swift (2 hunks)
  • Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomTests.swift (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Sources/AblyChat/Room.swift (1)

Line range hint 215-250: Ensure Correct Ordering of Features According to Precedence

The sorting logic in createFeatureChannelPartialDependencies uses RoomFeature.areInPrecedenceListOrder to determine the order of contributors. Please verify that the comparison function correctly implements the precedence as per the CHA-RC2e specification. This ensures that features are processed in the intended sequence, preventing potential unintended behavior.

Sources/AblyChat/RoomFeature.swift Show resolved Hide resolved
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomTests.swift Show resolved Hide resolved
@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian changed the title Implement lifecycle contributor precedence [ECO-5149] Implement lifecycle contributor precedence Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@maratal maratal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian merged commit ee6194b into main Dec 5, 2024
12 checks passed
@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian deleted the 153-lifecycle-contributor-precedence branch December 5, 2024 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement lifecycle contributor precedence
2 participants