Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement “previously attached” part of CHA-RL4b1 #104

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

lawrence-forooghian
Copy link
Collaborator

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian commented Nov 11, 2024

Based on ably/specification#200 at d9af7bf. I’m assuming that the “no call” in this spec point is a typo and means “a call”; have asked in ably/specification#200 (comment).

Needed for when we integrate the room lifecycle manager into the rest of the SDK in #47 (else there will be a crash when running the integration tests, because a channel’s first ATTACHED status change has resumed == false and our precondition will fail).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new property to track contributor attachment status, enhancing state management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of contributor attach and detach events, ensuring accurate state transitions.
  • Tests

    • Added new test cases for contributor state changes and lifecycle operations, enhancing test coverage and robustness.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@lawrence-forooghian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 279ae93 and a1703dc.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the RoomLifecycleManager.swift file, enhancing protocols and the DefaultRoomLifecycleManager actor. A new property, hasBeenAttached, is added to track contributor attachment status. This impacts how state changes are processed, particularly regarding pending discontinuity events. Additionally, the DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift file is updated with new test cases to improve coverage of contributor state changes and lifecycle operations, ensuring robust error handling and management of transient disconnect timeouts.

Changes

File Change Summary
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift - Added var hasBeenAttached: Bool to ContributorAnnotation struct.
- Updated method signature of performAttachOperation.
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift - Added new test methods for contributor attach/detach events.
- Enhanced checks for transient disconnect timeout management.
- Updated error handling verification.
- Refactored existing tests for clarity.

Possibly related issues

  • ECO-4952: The changes in this PR may contribute to implementing the room lifecycle spec as outlined in the related documentation.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • umair-ably
  • maratal

🐇 "In the room where we chat,
Contributors gather, just like that.
With states that shift and change,
Our lifecycle's now less strange.
With tests that cover every nook,
We hop along, just take a look!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (1)

Line range hint 975-1011: Consider refactoring duplicated code in test methods

The test methods contributorAttachEvent_withResumeFalse_withOperationInProgress_withContributorAttachedPreviously_recordsPendingDiscontinuityEvent and contributorAttachEvent_withResumeFalse_withOperationInProgress_withContributorNotAttachedPreviously_doesNotRecordPendingDiscontinuityEvent share similar setup and teardown code. To improve maintainability and adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider extracting common code into helper functions or setup methods.

Also applies to: 1015-1037

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d320404 and 279ae93.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (4 hunks)
  • Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (2)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T18:34:37.252Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift (6)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:627-631
Timestamp: 2024-10-01T12:55:21.968Z
Learning: The closure `detachImpl` in `RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift` functions as intended without external state variables to track invocation count.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335
Timestamp: 2024-09-23T19:56:39.435Z
Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-18T18:34:37.252Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager`, handling of unexpected contributor states after attach failure will be addressed in issue #49.
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian
PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54
File: Tests/AblyChatTests/RoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift:335-335
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:58:47.376Z
Learning: In Swift Testing, test method names do not need to start with `test`.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift (5)

221-222: LGTM: Well-documented property addition.

The hasBeenAttached property is appropriately documented with a clear reference to the specification (CHA-RL1f).


241-242: LGTM: Proper initialization of new property.

The hasBeenAttached property is correctly initialized to false, which is the appropriate default state for new contributors.


Line range hint 381-392: LGTM: Correctly implements CHA-RL4b1 specification.

The implementation properly handles the "previously attached" case by checking both the resumed flag and hasBeenAttached state before recording a pending discontinuity event. This aligns with the PR objectives and fixes the potential crash during integration tests.


656-656: LGTM: Proper state update after successful attach.

The hasBeenAttached flag is correctly set to true after a successful attach operation, ensuring accurate state tracking.


Line range hint 381-392: Verify implementation matches specification requirements.

The implementation appears to correctly address the requirements, but let's verify the behavior matches the specification exactly.

Also applies to: 656-656

✅ Verification successful

Implementation correctly handles CHA-RL4b1 specification requirements

The implementation correctly handles the CHA-RL4b1 specification requirements by:

  • Checking for non-resumed ATTACHED state changes during operations
  • Verifying previous attachment state via hasBeenAttached flag
  • Recording discontinuity events when appropriate
  • Properly handling error cases with precondition checks

The code follows the specification exactly and includes appropriate logging for debugging purposes. No issues were found in the implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation matches CHA-RL4b1 specification requirements

# Test: Search for any other places where hasBeenAttached might need to be considered
rg -l "hasBeenAttached" --type swift

# Test: Search for any related test cases
rg -l "testPreviouslyAttached|testFirstAttach" --type swift

Length of output: 142


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation more thoroughly

# Check the content of RoomLifecycleManager.swift to understand the full context
cat Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift

# Search for test files related to RoomLifecycleManager
fd "RoomLifecycleManager.*Test.*\.swift$"

# Search for any specification or documentation files
fd -e md | xargs rg -l "CHA-RL4b1"

Length of output: 46912

Tests/AblyChatTests/DefaultRoomLifecycleManagerTests.swift Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Based on [1] at d9af7bf. I’m assuming that the “no call” in this spec
point is a typo and means “a call”; have asked in [2].

Needed for when we integrate the room lifecycle manager into the rest of
the SDK in #47 (else there will be a crash when running the integration
tests, because a channel’s first ATTACHED status change has resumed ==
false and our precondition will fail).

[1] ably/specification#200
[2] ably/specification#200 (comment)
@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian force-pushed the implement-previously-attached-check branch from 279ae93 to a1703dc Compare November 11, 2024 13:12
Base automatically changed from 47-groundwork to main November 11, 2024 13:25
Copy link
Collaborator

@umair-ably umair-ably left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants