Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(MP)Leopard body upgrade #3575

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

Tipchik87
Copy link
Contributor

At the moment Leopard is very close to Viper in strength but very far from Retaliation (Retaliation recently got the necessary hp buff) so I've slightly increased Leopard's kinetic armour and hitpoints to be about the same as Scorpion but still inferior to Cobra.

"armourKinetic": 12 ->14
"hitpoints": 107 ->120

"armourKinetic": 12 ->14
"hitpoints": 107 ->120
@KJeff01 KJeff01 modified the milestones: 4.5.0, 4.5.0-beta1 Jan 13, 2024
@KJeff01 KJeff01 merged commit b1fabba into Warzone2100:master Feb 1, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@maxsupermanhd
Copy link
Member

This pull request has:

  • No links to any previous discussion of the change (such as on Discord or the forums)
  • No explanation of what games modes + tech modes + play styles / maps it has been tested on
  • No comparisons, videos, spreadsheets / charts, or information that will aide contributors & players in assessing the impact of the change on balance and gameplay.
  • No discussion and Voting (on Discord)
  • No thread on the Warzone 2100 Discord’s #mp-balance-proposals channel to gather more discussion and feedback from the player community were created.

And yet somehow it was silently merged bypassing every single guideline that was put in place to prevent exactly this from happening.

Laughs in doc/MPBalanceChangeProcess.md

P.S. I thought we were already over this thing. Seeing such an internal rot of the guidelines enforcement really makes me reconsider my dedication to 10 minutes a day of writing new Autohoster backend (it's half way there already btw).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants