-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AJG.Code review #11
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
AJG.Code review #11
Conversation
Sveta's Edits
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I ran your code, I got the error "Error: object 'DNAme' not found." I would remove the install.package codes from the markdown or the reviewer will not be able to run the code!
FYI, I think you started working on Svetlana's version when it was merged to the main.
colnames(idh1_idh2) <- c("IDH") | ||
compiled <- cbind(tet, idh1_idh2) | ||
View(compiled) # scrolled through and identified the patient/sample number that had the mutations in both TET2 and IDH | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great! Wish I could have done this!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think regarding your questions; the final TET2/IDH comparisons are looking at some Bayesian analyses to see which co-founders have the highest impact on methylation status. I believe the probe numbers are the number of statistically significant data points where the model (ie design 1/2/3) explains the methylation difference. Maybe?!
No description provided.