Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: drop ruby 2.6 #208

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

chore: drop ruby 2.6 #208

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

sighphyre
Copy link
Member

@sighphyre sighphyre commented Sep 26, 2024

Drops support for Ruby 2.6 + JRuby 9.3, which depends on Ruby 2.6.

Why

Ruby 2.6 has been EOL for over two years and outside normal maintenance for three years. For almost all users this should have been superseded by Ruby 2.7 (also EOL), which is the tip of the 2.x range. Understandably some users won't be able to smoothly move to 3.x, so this is allows us to draw a line in the sand and support the latest 2.7

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11057798940

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall first build on chore/drop-ruby-2.6 at 95.374%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11057284454: 95.4%
Covered Lines: 433
Relevant Lines: 454

💛 - Coveralls

@sighphyre sighphyre self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@rarruda rarruda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉

Copy link
Member

@chriswk chriswk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, please :)

@sighphyre sighphyre merged commit b7b9bf2 into main Sep 30, 2024
31 checks passed
@sighphyre sighphyre deleted the chore/drop-ruby-2.6 branch September 30, 2024 06:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants