Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfixes related to inverse property labels #488

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 1, 2021

Conversation

jgonggrijp
Copy link
Member

I noticed that generated inverse properties were again (or still?) appearing without a label in the semantic search Dropdown view. Fixing this led me through a short cascade of minor bugs due to oversights on my part. The commit list below tells the full story. The end result is that all traversals in the dropdown have labels "for real", a new isRdfProperty utility function entered the scene, and a bunch of (regression) tests was added that now all pass without errors.

I discovered the bug that started the cascade while working on #486. There existed no issues dedicated to the bugs I fixed, so I'm attaching this PR directly to the bug label and the project board.

@jgonggrijp jgonggrijp added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 1, 2021
@jgonggrijp jgonggrijp requested a review from BeritJanssen July 1, 2021 13:07
Copy link
Member

@BeritJanssen BeritJanssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me. Good catch that views should be removed after each item in the test suite.

@jgonggrijp jgonggrijp merged commit 562e27c into develop Jul 1, 2021
@jgonggrijp jgonggrijp deleted the feature/flat-property-fix branch July 1, 2021 13:44
@jgonggrijp jgonggrijp added this to the Next release milestone Jul 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants