-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Issues: TimeEval/GutenTAG
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Timestamp is missing in time series data generator
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
🏅 very low
MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have)
#37
opened Sep 4, 2023 by
Manonandan
Create new mode - ts_augmentation
comp: GutenTAG (general)
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
🏅 very low
MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have)
#35
opened Jul 25, 2023 by
DhavalRepo18
New anomaly: Normalize
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
🏅 low
MoSCoW: Could-have
#14
opened Feb 7, 2023 by
SebastianSchmidl
Add a smooth transition to the anomaly API
enhancement
New feature or request
🏅 low
MoSCoW: Could-have
#13
opened Feb 7, 2023 by
SebastianSchmidl
New anomaly: pattern-flip
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
🏅 low
MoSCoW: Could-have
#12
opened Feb 7, 2023 by
SebastianSchmidl
Add post-processing options
enhancement
New feature or request
🏅 very low
MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have)
#11
opened Feb 7, 2023 by
SebastianSchmidl
Allow definition of transient base oscillations in formula
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
🏅 very low
MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have)
#10
opened Feb 7, 2023 by
SebastianSchmidl
Use existing TS file as base oscillation
enhancement
New feature or request
🏅 very low
MoSCoW: Wont-have (Would-have)
#9
opened Feb 7, 2023 by
SebastianSchmidl
ProTip!
Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.