typo fixes

Synthetixio · Oct 12, 2023 · 56462f0 · 56462f0
1 parent f3e5bdd
commit 56462f0
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/content/sccp/sccp-2051.md b/content/sccp/sccp-2051.md
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ type: Governance
 ---
 
 # Simple Summary
-This SCCP proposes to boost L2's rewards by `130,178` snx during the minting week starting the 16th of October and reverting that increase back to it's original state in the subsequent week.
+
+This SCCP proposes to boost L2's rewards by `130,178` snx during the minting week starting the 16th of October and reverting that increase back to its original state in the subsequent week.
 
 # Abstract
 
@@ -19,7 +20,7 @@ The following contract calls would be invoked in order to temporarily boost rewa
 
 # Motivation
 
-The main motivation is to compensate L2 stakers for the missed inflationary rewards during the week of the 9th of October. This occured due to an insufficient gas reversion [L1 minting transaction](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9db69f2f9d9782e003eae79da083088355d2729a123e3897bf5a3f1a46072832) in the weekly inflation print transaction. A more hollistic fix would be proposed in  [sip-2036](https://sips.synthetix.io/sips/sip-2036) that aims at preventing a similar situation from occuring.
+The main motivation is to compensate L2 stakers for the missed inflationary rewards during the week of the 9th of October. This was due to an insufficient gas reversion [L1 minting transaction](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9db69f2f9d9782e003eae79da083088355d2729a123e3897bf5a3f1a46072832) in the weekly inflation print transaction. A more holistic fix would be proposed in [sip-2036](https://sips.synthetix.io/sips/sip-2036) that aims at preventing a similar situation from occurring.
 
 # Copyright
 

diff --git a/content/sips/sip-2036.md b/content/sips/sip-2036.md
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ The `RewardsDistribution` contract currently ignores errors when it attempts to
 
 In reference to [SCCP-2051](https://sips.synthetix.io/sccp/sccp-2051), as can be seen in the [minting transaction](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9db69f2f9d9782e003eae79da083088355d2729a123e3897bf5a3f1a46072832) the inflation destined for L2 were printed, but were never relayed over to optimism. This is because of a check by the optimism's [ResourceMetering.sol](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism/blob/ac2df11b30aca5cb95fc823ddc8966bd1a570c0e/packages/contracts-bedrock/src/L1/ResourceMetering.sol#L144) that asserts that a transaction's gas limit exceeds a minimum, the latter depends on the length of the contract call.
 
-This SIP proposes to incorporate of a revert, that throws the entire minting transaction in case the distribution of rewards to L2 stakers fails. Hence, keeper would be incentivized to boost the gas limit to the point where the transaction doesn't revert in order to earn the subsidized 100 snx per week in keeping fee. 
+This SIP proposes to incorporate a revert, that throws the entire minting transaction in case the distribution of rewards to L2 stakers fails. Hence, keeper would be incentivized to boost the gas limit to the point where the transaction doesn't revert in order to earn the subsidized 100 snx per week in keeping fee. 
 
 ## Specification