Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

co-608: image fix #317

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: release-6.0.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

manojSRawat
Copy link
Contributor

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Type of change

Please choose appropriate options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes in the below checkboxes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Ran Test A
  • Ran Test B

Test Configuration:

  • Software versions: Nodejs 8.11.2
  • Hardware versions:

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ function imageData(image) {
return (bufferImage = image.replace("data:image/jpg;base64,", ""));
} else if (image.includes("data:image/jpeg;base64")) {
return (bufferImage = image.replace("data:image/jpeg;base64,", ""));
} else if (image.includes("data:application/octet-stream;base64")) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@manojSRawat The application/octet-stream type is shown for documents when mimetype is unknown ( I have seen this when I have opened file in spreadsheets and word docs) ? (Correct me if I am wrong). So considering it as an image will be wrong.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also face this kind of issue while uploading files on s3 without setting content-type.
@vaivk369 @vinukumar-vs could you please check if there is any change in upload functionality that might be related to this issue?

@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ function createSAObject(data, count) {
children: arr,
});
} else if (data.image) {
if (data.image.includes("data:image/")) {
if (data.image.includes("data:")) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why it was added & now why it is removed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

data:image is the actual way of finding the image or not. Why it is removed now. How are you identifying the data is image or not?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are getting "application/octet-stream" in response header.
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can add a check based on file extension but agian that's not a correct way because user can modify the file extension and upload it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants