Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rollback check_properties.yml #2551

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

rollback check_properties.yml #2551

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

Ludy87
Copy link
Contributor

@Ludy87 Ludy87 commented Dec 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

Please provide a summary of the changes, including relevant motivation and context.

Closes #(issue_number)

Checklist

  • I have read the Contribution Guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have attached images of the change if it is UI based
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • If my code has heavily changed functionality I have updated relevant docs on Stirling-PDFs doc repo
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have read the section Add New Translation Tags (for new translation tags only)

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 22, 2024
@Ludy87 Ludy87 changed the title Update check_properties.yml rollback check_properties.yml Dec 22, 2024
@Frooodle Frooodle merged commit cbdec6e into Stirling-Tools:main Dec 22, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Frooodle Frooodle Frooodle approved these changes

@reecebrowne reecebrowne Awaiting requested review from reecebrowne reecebrowne is a code owner

@DarioGii DarioGii Awaiting requested review from DarioGii DarioGii is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Ludy87 @Frooodle