Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix decrypting pack config keys under additionalProperties #5225
Fix decrypting pack config keys under additionalProperties #5225
Changes from 12 commits
bffccc5
46a892c
6e864f3
44e0436
2354014
9d7c1d5
3543ad1
e1ef44b
46ce281
8bf7d2a
a2644c2
b7672ed
26741cd
e69fbae
a483888
d67b3c9
4d3be4a
574034f
d0d9924
6bfa390
532e15f
1d613bc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, if that works it should be much more straight forward to understand the code now - well, at least for me :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And re - using copy - I actually verified, if we didn't use copy with
defaultdict
version, we also don't need to use it here - it's returning by reference version in both scenarios.And since I believe we indeed never manipulate those values, only read / access them, copy is probably not needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. We modify the
config
object, but we don't modify (and probably should not modify) the schema itself. So, references are perfect in this case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If user wants that value in the config to actually be decrypted, they still need to use
decrypt_kv
Jinja filter, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No. Config is automatically decrypted when the schema lists the key as
secret: true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See
_get_datastore_value_for_expression()
inconfig_loader.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for clarification - I was just somewhat confused by the test case aka something didn't add up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pushed a fix for this test - 574034f.
That's the part which confused me a bit.
I assumed we don't do decryption because the value which was stored and the one which was retrieved was supposed to be the same (but the KVP model layer doesn't perform any encryption and we need to encrypt the value ourselves when storing it).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah! That's why it seemed to be working before, but wasn't. Thanks for the fix!