Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP : get additional data from HerdingspikesSortingExtractor #3525

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

b-grimaud
Copy link
Contributor

It seems there already was some attempt to extract the additional info with load_unit_info a while ago.

For now, this PR can extract the location of a unit with get_unit_location, as you would with get_unit_spike_train.
The unit locations are loaded by default, as I don't think the extra memory and computation costs should be very significant.

The rest of the data that HerdingSpikes provides is per spike :

  • Amplitude
  • Waveforms (possibly redundant ?)
  • Channel index
  • Unit index
  • x and y coordinates

This should be quite a bit more memory intensive to retrieve, and I'm not entirely sure of the use case for it. Nevertheless, I can see that it was considered as a possibility in the code that was already there.

Any feedback would be appreciated !

@mhhennig
Copy link
Member

mhhennig commented Nov 7, 2024

Thank you! I'll take a look asap.

@samuelgarcia
Copy link
Member

thanks for this.
I think we should have more discussion about the API.
If the additional data is at unit level we just could add some properties in the sorting object this would make more sens.
If the additional data is at spike level we would need an additional function at API level not do this extractor per extractor.

def get_unit_location(
self,
unit_id,
segment_index=None,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we need segment_index here, does the units chnage over segment ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't work with multi-segmented recordings so I don't have much perspective on this. Since get_unit_spike_train is implemented at both the sorting extractor and sorting segment level I did the same here just in case.

@b-grimaud
Copy link
Contributor Author

If the additional data is at spike level we would need an additional function at API level not do this extractor per extractor.

This is what I was wondering about. The easiest solutions for now would be to return matching arrays per unit, but for the sake of reusability I guess the BaseSorting class would need to be able to handle arbitrary per-spike properties.

In the case of HerdingSpikes, a lot of useful data is already computed or extracted : waveforms, locations and amplitudes are already included, PCA is also computed but not included in the output. All of this is then recomputed by the sorting analyzer. Then it would be up to individual sorting extractors to match the expected data structure.

@mhhennig
Copy link
Member

On the data HS extracts:

  • Amplitude: This is not the real amplitude, but a re-scaled version. I don't think these are useful.
  • Waveforms: These are peak channel waveforms, internally cached memmapped for quick PCA computation and can be written out into the hdf5 file the extractor reads.
  • Channel index: Useful as these are peak channels.
  • Unit index: Internal use.
  • x and y coordinates: COM based estimates, very useful as they are very quick to estimate.

I feel peak channel and x/y locations could be put into a SortingAnayzer object, that's where they would normally be found. Would this be possible?

@h-mayorquin
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree with Sam that the unit properties should be written as such. I would be curios about how to handle spike properties if you have them so tagging along here.

@alejoe91 alejoe91 added the extractors Related to extractors module label Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
extractors Related to extractors module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants