-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Task resource v1 readiness #3113
Merged
sfc-gh-jcieslak
merged 14 commits into
tasks-v1-readiness
from
task-resource-v1-readiness
Nov 5, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
38b8550
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak 6837bc5
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak c2f707d
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak 6843e03
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak 12eadb0
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak 28bf6a5
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak 62adccb
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak bba9569
Merge branch 'refs/heads/main' into task-resource-v1-readiness
sfc-gh-jcieslak 80ca12e
wip
sfc-gh-jcieslak f0514bc
docs re-generated
sfc-gh-jcieslak ee9583d
Added test that proves the issue
sfc-gh-jcieslak 90404b9
Merge branch 'refs/heads/main' into task-resource-v1-readiness
sfc-gh-jcieslak 012fb18
Resolve merge conflicts
sfc-gh-jcieslak 90d7046
Resolve merge conflicts and fix failing tests
sfc-gh-jcieslak File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
22 changes: 0 additions & 22 deletions
22
pkg/acceptance/bettertestspoc/assert/objectassert/task_snowflake_gen.go
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
pkg/acceptance/bettertestspoc/assert/objectparametersassert/task_parameters_snowflake_gen.go
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions
18
pkg/acceptance/bettertestspoc/assert/resourceassert/task_resource_ext.go
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
package resourceassert | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"fmt" | ||
"strconv" | ||
|
||
"github.com/Snowflake-Labs/terraform-provider-snowflake/pkg/sdk" | ||
|
||
"github.com/Snowflake-Labs/terraform-provider-snowflake/pkg/acceptance/bettertestspoc/assert" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func (t *TaskResourceAssert) HasAfterIds(ids ...sdk.SchemaObjectIdentifier) *TaskResourceAssert { | ||
t.AddAssertion(assert.ValueSet("after.#", strconv.FormatInt(int64(len(ids)), 10))) | ||
for i, id := range ids { | ||
t.AddAssertion(assert.ValueSet(fmt.Sprintf("after.%d", i), id.FullyQualifiedName())) | ||
} | ||
return t | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The order shouldn't matter here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SHouldn't because the assertion does not have InOrder in name or because Snowflake ordering for alter in non-deterministic?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, but that should be resolved in newly added TODO for asserts to generate or create a helper for creating asserts for list with non-deterministic order. Right now, this one work (despite being reliant on order) and I would leave it as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's at least add InOrder suffix to the name of the function then (may be added in the next PR)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we discussed this in one of the previous PRs. Snowflake does not guarantee item order, so in general we should compare ID collections, not one by one. For cases where the order matters, we should add a comment about that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed in: For now, renamed to have InOrder suffix, the limitation of order was added to assert improvements some time ago (it should be in main or in this pr.)