Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
POC implementation of WAComboResponse acting directly on a socket stream #1240
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
POC implementation of WAComboResponse acting directly on a socket stream #1240
Changes from all commits
ab5162c
fb28df3
89c6a61
6946a38
dc76211
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't look right.
#writeCharacterStreamOn:
wants aString
, should we instead send#writeCharacterStreamOn:
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be something else, yes. I presume, you meant to write
writeBinaryStreamOn:
?We have to be careful though. I remember having to fight a lot with the wrapping streams (i.e., Zinc).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
Let's figure out the problem and solve it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#writeCharacterStreamOn:
simply delegates toWriteStream on:
, which operates on collections, so in that sense it's fine. Also, this is in a test and there is no#writeBinaryStreamOn:
so far. I'll just leave it if you don't object.