Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: housekeeping - sss_override #7487

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danlavu
Copy link

@danlavu danlavu commented Jul 10, 2024

housekeeping, the following is looked at and may have been done:

  • fixed typos and standardized formatting
  • renamed test cases to improve the clarity of what the test does
  • improved docstring language, setup, steps and expected results
  • synced code with the docstring order
  • removed necessary configuration relevant to the test
  • added pytest.mark.importance to test cases

noteable changes:

src/tests/system/tests/test_sss_override.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tests/system/tests/test_sss_override.py Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tests/system/tests/test_sss_override.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tests/system/tests/test_sss_override.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch 3 times, most recently from 377b019 to 2265713 Compare July 15, 2024 16:28
@danlavu danlavu requested a review from aplopez July 15, 2024 16:52
@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch 2 times, most recently from 14a5607 to 79f0de5 Compare July 16, 2024 18:12
@danlavu danlavu requested a review from aplopez July 18, 2024 13:38
Copy link
Contributor

@aplopez aplopez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK. Thanks.

@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch 2 times, most recently from d43c5b3 to c07d954 Compare July 24, 2024 18:54
@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

@danlavu, were recent updates merely rebases?

@danlavu
Copy link
Author

danlavu commented Jul 24, 2024

This PR was fixing a variable, lines 229 and 230.

@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

@danlavu, please rebase

@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

@shridhargadekar, @aplopez, please re-review after rebase

@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch 2 times, most recently from e1c3824 to 3d97d55 Compare August 2, 2024 18:38
Copy link
Contributor

@aplopez aplopez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still looking good.

@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch from 3d97d55 to 4110fd2 Compare August 13, 2024 13:04
@danlavu
Copy link
Author

danlavu commented Aug 19, 2024

@shridhargadekar poke

@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch from 4110fd2 to 8151723 Compare August 20, 2024 13:54
@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch 2 times, most recently from d43fead to 45f342a Compare August 21, 2024 13:41
housekeeping, the following is looked at and may have been done:

* fixed typos and standardized formatting
* renamed test cases to improve the clarity of what the test does
* improved docstring language, setup, steps and expected results
* synced code with the docstring order
* removed necessary configuration relevant to the test
* added pytest.mark.importance to test cases

noteable changes:
@danlavu danlavu force-pushed the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch from 45f342a to 144cf5d Compare August 21, 2024 13:46
@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

Pushed PR: #7487

  • master
    • 14d7796 - tests: housekeeping - sss_override
  • sssd-2-9
    • 5d8b435 - tests: housekeeping - sss_override

@danlavu danlavu deleted the tests-housekeeping-sss_override branch November 4, 2024 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants