ci: explicitly set which topologies are already provisioned

[pbrezina]

PRCI uses containers that already have multiple topologies provisioned
out of the box. pytest-mh and sssd-test-framework recently got the
ability to provision topology directly from pytest so in order to skip
this step in PRCI we need to set it explicitly.

Note that the client container is currently not enrolled in AD, so we
use topology setup there. Therefore if you run the tests locally with
AD running, you don't have to do a thing - client will automatically
join and leave the AD domain when AD/IPA-TRUST-AD topology is run.

---

Please note that this needs to be closed together with changes to other repositories:

• topology: provision topologies if not already using per-topology setup sssd-test-framework#103
• provision: do not join domains automatically in Idm CI sssd-ci-containers#95
• Add support for reentrant utilities to MultihostHost and other improvements next-actions/pytest-mh#54

[justin-stephenson]

Please note that this needs to be closed together with changes to other repositories:

* [topology: provision topologies if not already using per-topology setup sssd-test-framework#103](https://github.com/SSSD/sssd-test-framework/pull/103)

* [provision: do not join domains automatically in Idm CI sssd-ci-containers#95](https://github.com/SSSD/sssd-ci-containers/pull/95)

* [Add support for reentrant utilities to MultihostHost and other improvements next-actions/pytest-mh#54](https://github.com/next-actions/pytest-mh/pull/54)

@pbrezina Will a draft SSSD PR which updates requirements.txt to use these branches be needed to see how these changes may affect SSSD PRCI?

[danlavu]

@pbrezina I'm not sure if we need to make changes to idmci for provisioned_topologies, @jakub-vavra-cz ping

[pbrezina]

@pbrezina I'm not sure if we need to make changes to idmci for provisioned_topologies, @jakub-vavra-cz ping

No, idmci will run the topology controller code. You just want to add the adminpw option:

5579577#diff-58b2cb2530f4c75cc3718794b978b4cdfa5c8138fbf6443c3399468f208aa475R40-R48

[pbrezina]

Please note that this needs to be closed together with changes to other repositories:

* [topology: provision topologies if not already using per-topology setup sssd-test-framework#103](https://github.com/SSSD/sssd-test-framework/pull/103)

* [provision: do not join domains automatically in Idm CI sssd-ci-containers#95](https://github.com/SSSD/sssd-ci-containers/pull/95)

* [Add support for reentrant utilities to MultihostHost and other improvements next-actions/pytest-mh#54](https://github.com/next-actions/pytest-mh/pull/54)

@pbrezina Will a draft SSSD PR which updates requirements.txt to use these branches be needed to see how these changes may affect SSSD PRCI?

We can do it if you want, but you can run it locally so it should not be strictly needed.

[justin-stephenson]

Ack, thank you.

[pbrezina]

Pushed PR: #7349

• master
  • b026d62 - ci: explicitly set which topologies are already provisioned
• sssd-2-8
  • 065cd39 - ci: explicitly set which topologies are already provisioned
• sssd-2-9
  • d29e401 - ci: explicitly set which topologies are already provisioned