Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: build passkey for centos-9 #6998

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

ikerexxe
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ikerexxe ikerexxe marked this pull request as draft October 24, 2023 10:29
@alexey-tikhonov alexey-tikhonov self-assigned this Oct 24, 2023
@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

Let's also fix

%if 0%{?fedora} >= 39

Spec file will be pulled into RHEL10 via Fedora ELN.

@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

Not needed to fix CI issue, but I'd suggest to take opportunity to clean up entire configure.sh:

  • we don't run CI for RHEL/CentOS 6/7
  • -redhat-fedora-2[0-2]* also can be removed
  • everywhere centos-9 is used it makes sense to add 10 as well
  • 'subid' support should be enabled for F40>=0 as well (probably can be merged into "--without-python2-bindings" because we already don't care about Fedora older than 35)

@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

Not needed to fix CI issue, but I'd suggest to take opportunity to clean up entire configure.sh

But if you wouldn't like to address above list in this PR, then ACK.

contrib/ci/configure.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Also include RHEL9+ to build passkey in the spec file.

Signed-off-by: Iker Pedrosa <[email protected]>
@ikerexxe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not needed to fix CI issue, but I'd suggest to take opportunity to clean up entire configure.sh:

* we don't run CI for RHEL/CentOS 6/7

* `-redhat-fedora-2[0-2]*` also can be removed

* everywhere centos-9 is used it makes sense to add 10 as well

* 'subid' support should be enabled for F40>=0 as well (probably can be merged into "--without-python2-bindings" because we already don't care about Fedora older than 35)

I think it's better to fix this in another PR.

@ikerexxe ikerexxe marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2023 08:56
@ikerexxe
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI failures are unrelated

@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

@aplopez, are you fine with current version?

Copy link
Contributor

@aplopez aplopez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK. Thanks

@alexey-tikhonov
Copy link
Member

Pushed PR: #6998

  • master
    • 5a211ec - CI: build passkey for centos-9
  • sssd-2-9
    • fa33c99 - CI: build passkey for centos-9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants