-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUILD: get rid of --with-semanage
./configure switch
#6961
Conversation
ffe0663
to
d0888c2
Compare
@@ -459,7 +456,7 @@ int sss_del_seuser(const char *login_name) | |||
sss_semanage_close(handle); | |||
return ret; | |||
} | |||
#else /* HAVE_SEMANAGE && HAVE_SELINUX */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the comment should not be removed, but modified to reflect the new situation (/* HAVE_SELINUX */). This else
is about 400 lines away from its corresponding if
, making it hard to know at a single glance what it is doing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack, thank you.
:relnote:Explicit `--with-semanage` ./configure switch was removed, going forward `--with-selinux` includes this. Resolves: SSSD#6647
d0888c2
to
c224d1e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
:relnote:Explicit
--with-semanage
./configure switch was removed, going forward--with-selinux
includes this.Resolves: #6647
It was very confusing to have independent
--with-semanage
configure switch in addition to--with-selinux
, at the very least not all combinations were actually supported.