Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.10.0rc1-slim to 3.13.0rc1-slim #102

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

spresser-hlrs
Copy link

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 4 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • ruleserver/app/Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:3.13.0rc1-slim, as this image has only 43 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-DEBIAN11-GLIBC-5927133
  829  
high severity Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-DEBIAN11-GLIBC-5927133
  829  
critical severity Directory Traversal
SNYK-DEBIAN11-DPKG-2847942
  714  
critical severity Use After Free
SNYK-DEBIAN11-GLIBC-1296898
  714  
critical severity CVE-2024-37371
SNYK-DEBIAN11-KRB5-7411316
  714  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Directory Traversal
🦉 Use After Free

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
3 Security Hotspots
D Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants