-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[workspace] Withdraw stable API support for several externals #17324
[workspace] Withdraw stable API support for several externals #17324
Conversation
+@rpoyner-tri for feature review, please. |
@rpoyner-tri what do you think about +(status: single reviewer ok)? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
single is fine. Still looking.
Reviewed 50 of 50 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 1 unresolved discussion, LGTM missing from assignee rpoyner-tri(platform) (waiting on @jwnimmer-tri)
-- commits
line 7 at r1:
grammar? missing words?
Code quote:
The python libraries either for maintainer-only code (github3, template),
or else brittle interior dependencies (clang) of private tools (mkdoc).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @jwnimmer-tri)
a discussion (no related file):
Similar to a previous PR, are there names in tools/workspace/new_release.py
that need updating?
These are the python- and models-only repositories that should not be public. The models already have Drake-public filegroup wrappers where appropriate. The python libraries are either maintainer-only code (github3, template), or else brittle interior dependencies (clang) of private tools (mkdoc).
104ed5e
to
17d3e81
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dismissed @rpoyner-tri from a discussion.
Reviewable status: 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @rpoyner-tri)
a discussion (no related file):
Previously, rpoyner-tri (Rick Poyner (rico)) wrote…
Similar to a previous PR, are there names in
tools/workspace/new_release.py
that need updating?
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all discussions resolved, LGTM from assignee rpoyner-tri(platform) (waiting on @jwnimmer-tri)
These are the python- and models-only repositories that should not be public.
The models already have Drake-public filegroup wrappers where appropriate, in the
@drake//
namespace.The python libraries are either for maintainer-only code (github3, uritemplate), or else brittle interior dependencies (clang) of Drake-private tools (mkdoc).
Relates to #17231 in the sense of a uniform stable / internal policy, even though there is no C/C++ code here.
This change is