Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow unwrap and pollUnwrap to take in custom descriptions #1162

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

younata
Copy link
Member

@younata younata commented Oct 10, 2024

Fixes #1160

This also allows pollUnwrap to take in custom timeout and polling intervals.

Also fixes a bug in the async version of withAssertionRecorder where we didn't reset the assertion recorder after tests.

The PR should summarize what was changed and why. Here are some questions to
help you if you're not sure:

  • What behavior was changed?
  • What code was refactored / updated to support this change?
  • What issues are related to this PR? Or why was this change introduced?

Checklist - While not every PR needs it, new features should consider this list:

  • Does this have tests?
  • Does this have documentation?
  • Does this break the public API (Requires major version bump)?
  • Is this a new feature (Requires minor version bump)?

Also allow pollUnwrap to take in custom timeout and polling intervals.
Fixes a bug in the async version of withAssertionRecorder where we didn't reset the assertion recorder after tests
@younata younata merged commit f459a20 into main Oct 11, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@younata younata deleted the unwrap_description branch October 11, 2024 05:38
noamfreeman pushed a commit to noamfreeman/Nimble that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
Also allow pollUnwrap to take in custom timeout and polling intervals.
Fixes a bug in the async version of withAssertionRecorder where we didn't reset the assertion recorder after tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggestion: Allow passing description to unwrap requirements
1 participant