Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: 📝 Better documentation for latency properties #2653

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

Paillat-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev commented Nov 18, 2024

Summary

Self explanatory.

Information

  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting,
    examples, ...).

Checklist

  • I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.
  • I have updated the changelog to include these changes.

@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2024 09:00
@pullapprove4 pullapprove4 bot requested a review from Lulalaby November 18, 2024 09:00
@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev changed the title docs: 📝 Better documentation for latency methods docs: 📝 Better documentation for latency properties Nov 18, 2024
@Paillat-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Why do I feel like someone felt bored and just thought returning None was too easy...

@Lulalaby Lulalaby merged commit da90e33 into Pycord-Development:master Nov 28, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev deleted the docs-bot-latency branch November 28, 2024 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants