Testnets #152
Testnets #152
Conversation
feat: UI improvement - vouches info
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across three files. In Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint (1.23.1)
warning eslint-config-next > @next/eslint-plugin-next > [email protected]: Glob versions prior to v9 are no longer supported Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for proof-of-humanity-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/contracts/apis/APIPoH.ts (1)
156-160: Simplify the implementation by removing unnecessary variable.The
outvariable is redundant since the result is returned directly.Consider this more concise implementation:
const apiReader = APIPoH.getApiReader(_chainId); - let out: boolean = false; try { - out = await apiReader.get("vouches", [_voucher, _pohId, _address]); - return out; + return await apiReader.get("vouches", [_voucher, _pohId, _address]);src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/ActionBar.tsx (3)
209-209: Consider adding error recovery mechanismWhile setting
canAdvanceto false on failure is correct, consider adding a mechanism to reset it to true when conditions change. This prevents the button from remaining permanently disabled after a temporary failure.onFail() { !errorRef.current && toast.error("Advance is not possible"); errorRef.current = true; setCanAdvance(false); + // Reset error state after a delay or on condition changes + setTimeout(() => { + errorRef.current = false; + setCanAdvance(true); + }, 5000); }
Line range hint
244-272: Review effect dependencies and state updatesThe current implementation has potential issues:
- Setting
canAdvanceto true within this effect while also having it as a dependency could create an infinite loop- Including
canAdvancein the dependency array may cause unnecessary re-rendersConsider moving the
setCanAdvance(true)call outside this effect or using a more specific condition to prevent loops.useEffect(() => { if (action === ActionType.ADVANCE && !revocation) { - setCanAdvance(true); prepareAdvance({ args: [ requester, onChainVouches, offChainVouches.map((v) => { const sig = hexToSignature(v.signature); return { expirationTime: v.expiration, v: Number(sig.v), r: sig.r, s: sig.s, }; }), ], }); } if (action === ActionType.EXECUTE) prepareExecute({ args: [pohId, BigInt(index)] }); }, [ address, prepareExecute, action, requester, revocation, chain, userChainId, - canAdvance, ]);
Line range hint
1-533: Consider extracting advancement logic into a custom hookThe component handles multiple responsibilities and could benefit from better separation of concerns. Consider extracting the advancement-related logic (state, preparation, and execution) into a custom hook like
useAdvancement.This would:
- Improve testability
- Reduce component complexity
- Make the advancement logic reusable
Example structure:
// useAdvancement.ts export function useAdvancement({ action, revocation, requester, onChainVouches, offChainVouches, }) { const [canAdvance, setCanAdvance] = useState(true); // ... other advancement-related logic return { canAdvance, prepareAdvance, advance, }; } // ActionBar.tsx function ActionBar() { const { canAdvance, advance } = useAdvancement({ action, revocation, requester, onChainVouches, offChainVouches, }); // ... rest of the component }src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/page.tsx (3)
75-79: Optimize the filter condition for better performanceThe current filter implementation creates a new array for each comparison. Consider using
some()instead offilter().lengthfor better performance.- onChainVouches = onChainVouches.filter( - (onChainVoucher) => - offChainVouches.filter((voucher) => voucher.voucher === onChainVoucher) - .length === 0, - ); + onChainVouches = onChainVouches.filter( + (onChainVoucher) => + !offChainVouches.some((voucher) => voucher.voucher === onChainVoucher) + );
469-469: Consider implementing i18n for UI textThese UI strings should be internationalized to support multiple languages. Consider using a translation framework like
react-intlornext-i18next.Example implementation:
- This PoHID vouched for + {t('pohid.vouched_for')} ... - {request.status.id === "vouching" - ? "Available vouches for this PoHID" - : "Vouched for this request"} + {request.status.id === "vouching" + ? t('pohid.available_vouches') + : t('pohid.vouched_for_request')}Also applies to: 495-497
504-508: Enhance type safety with TypeScript improvementsConsider adding explicit type definitions for the component props and request status to improve type safety and maintainability.
type RequestStatus = 'vouching' | 'pending' | 'resolved' // Add all possible statuses type VouchProps = { isActive?: boolean; reason?: string; name?: string | null; // ... other props } // Usage <Vouch isActive={vouchLocal.vouchStatus?.isValid} reason={ request.status.id === RequestStatus.Vouching ? vouchLocal.vouchStatus?.reason : undefined } // ... other props />Also applies to: 516-516
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/ActionBar.tsx(5 hunks)src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/page.tsx(3 hunks)src/contracts/apis/APIPoH.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/contracts/apis/APIPoH.ts (2)
150-155: LGTM! Method signature follows established patterns.
The method signature is well-structured with proper typing and follows the class's established patterns for public static methods.
161-166: Verify contract's error handling for invalid parameters.
While the error handling follows the class's pattern, we should verify how the contract handles invalid parameters.
Let's check the contract implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is consistent and appropriate for contract interactions
The error handling in the isValidVouch method follows the established pattern in the APIPoH class, where all contract interactions are properly wrapped in try-catch blocks and throw consistent error responses. The error handling:
- Uses the same error structure as other methods in the class
- Properly catches and wraps any contract-level errors
- Is implemented through the common
getmethod that handles all contract interactions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the vouches function implementation in the contract
ast-grep --pattern 'function vouches($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Search for revert conditions related to vouches
rg -A 3 'revert.*vouch'
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for contract files and error handling patterns
# First, find relevant contract files
fd "\.sol$"
# Then search for error handling patterns in TypeScript code
rg -A 3 "throw.*Error.*ProofOfHumanity"
# Look for the specific function in the TypeScript implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'async function getVouches($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the APIPoH.ts file directly to understand the context better
cat src/contracts/apis/APIPoH.ts
# Also search for any ProofOfHumanity related files
fd -t f "ProofOfHumanity"
Length of output: 4919
src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/ActionBar.tsx (2)
106-106: LGTM: State initialization is appropriate
The canAdvance state is correctly initialized to true by default, maintaining consistency with the component's logic flow.
411-411: LGTM: Button disabled state is properly controlled
The disabled condition properly combines all necessary checks:
- Network state (
pending) - Chain validation (
userChainId !== chain.id) - Advancement possibility (
!canAdvance)
src/app/[pohid]/[chain]/[request]/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-562: Verify consistency of vouch-related components
Let's ensure all vouch-related components are properly updated with the new status-based logic.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:
Vouch-related components and logic are consistently implemented
The verification shows that:
- The Vouch component (
components/Vouch.tsx) is properly used throughout the codebase - The status-based conditional rendering (
status.id === "vouching") is correctly implemented - The reason prop handling is consistent with the component's interface
- The vouch-related data structures and state management are properly synchronized between on-chain and off-chain vouches
The changes in the file are part of a well-integrated vouch system implementation, with proper handling of different states and consistent prop passing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in vouch-related components and their props
# Find all files containing Vouch component usage
echo "Checking Vouch component usage..."
rg -l "Vouch" --type tsx
# Check for potential inconsistencies in reason prop handling
echo "Checking reason prop handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'reason={$_}' --lang tsx
# Check for potential inconsistencies in status handling
echo "Checking status-based conditionals..."
rg "status\.id === \"vouching\"" --type tsx -A 2
Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with more generic file type flags and patterns
# Find Vouch component usage
echo "Checking Vouch component files..."
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js | xargs rg "Vouch"
# Check reason prop handling in all JS/TS files
echo "Checking reason prop patterns..."
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js | xargs rg "reason=\{.*?\}"
# Check status-based conditionals
echo "Checking status handling..."
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js | xargs rg "status\.(id|state).*vouching"
# Find Vouch component definition
echo "Looking for Vouch component definition..."
fd "Vouch" -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js
Length of output: 26157
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation