Added a root_obj field to the NestedInline class #86
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ralkan
force-pushed
the
add_root_obj_to_inlines
branch
from
63367bb
to
b2afb74
Compare
|
Hey! Could this PR be reviewed and merged please? Because I really need this for another project. I had solved the issue in a hacky way but I'd really appreciate if this PR could be merged so I can update my code. https://github.com/ralkan/django-rulengine/pull/3/files Thanks! :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With this PR you should be able to get the root object (eg. for updating the queryset of deeply nested models based on the root object's pk or other field)