-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: rpc-proxy, xenmgr, updatemgr: Use rpc-autogen bindings module #184
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
dbus-gen generates a set of bindings for the currently supported API. Use the built module instead of relying on generating the bindings from the IDL in the source tree. Signed-off-by: Eric Chanudet <[email protected]>
dbus-gen generates a set of bindings for the currently supported API. Use the built module instead of relying on generating the bindings from the IDL in the source tree. Signed-off-by: Eric Chanudet <[email protected]>
dbus-gen generates a set of bindings for the currently supported API. Use the built module instead of relying on generating the bindings from the IDL in the source tree. Signed-off-by: Eric Chanudet <[email protected]>
@@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ Executable rpc-proxy | |||
transformers-base, | |||
xchwebsocket, | |||
xchxenstore, | |||
xchdb | |||
xchdb, | |||
rpc-autogen |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm surprised you had to add rpc-autogen. xchdb switched to rpc-autogen in its own commit, so I would think that is sufficient. Does rpc-proxy need some other idl binding that it was receiving transitively?
I don't know cabal, so I may be totally wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rpcgen does have its dbus stub generated from an xml, which is why I put the explicit dependency, but it could get the object from xchdb. I can check that.
Oh, I didn't realize rpc-proxy implemented an idl. Your change is good in
that case.
…On Tue, Jun 22, 2021, 4:42 PM Eric Chanudet ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In rpc-proxy/rpc-proxy.cabal
<#184 (comment)>:
> @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ Executable rpc-proxy
transformers-base,
xchwebsocket,
xchxenstore,
- xchdb
+ xchdb,
+ rpc-autogen
rpcgen does have its dbus stub generated from an xml
<https://github.com/OpenXT/idl/blob/master/interfaces/rpc_proxy.xml#L6>,
which is why I put the explicit dependency, but it could get the object
from xchdb. I can check that.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#184 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOKZPZLYBK6Z7VFWTC6V6LTUDYSRANCNFSM46YCVYRA>
.
|
dbus-gen generates a set of bindings for the currently supported API. Use the built module instead of relying on generating the bindings from the IDL in the source tree.