Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix:legacy cps session #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

fix:legacy cps session #22

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Oct 31, 2024

keep message.context to ensure session

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced message handling in query and search functionalities, allowing for more dynamic interactions.
    • Improved intent handling capabilities in the legacy pipeline, streamlining the integration of legacy support.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated method signatures to ensure compatibility with new message handling parameters.
  • Chores

    • Cleaned up unused imports and consolidated import statements for better clarity.

keep message.context to ensure session
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the LegacyCommonPlay class in ocp_pipeline/legacy.py and the MycroftCPSLegacyPipeline class in ocp_pipeline/opm.py. The send_query and search methods in LegacyCommonPlay have been modified to accept an optional message parameter, enhancing message handling. In MycroftCPSLegacyPipeline, method signatures have been adjusted to return Optional[IntentHandlerMatch], and the class now inherits from additional parent classes. These modifications streamline the intent matching process and improve legacy support within the OCP framework.

Changes

File Change Summary
ocp_pipeline/legacy.py - Updated send_query method to accept an optional message parameter.
- Updated search method to accept an optional message parameter.
- Imported dig_for_message from ovos_bus_client.message.
ocp_pipeline/opm.py - MycroftCPSLegacyPipeline now inherits from ConfidenceMatcherPipeline and OVOSAbstractApplication.
- Updated match_legacy and match method signatures to return Optional[IntentHandlerMatch].
- Modified register_ocp_intents for new event registrations.
- Updated handle_legacy_cps to accommodate the new search method signature.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix:legacy_cps #21: The handle_legacy_cps method in MycroftCPSLegacyPipeline has been updated to accommodate the new signature of the search method, which now accepts a message parameter, indicating a direct connection to the changes made in the main PR.

Suggested labels

fix

Poem

In the pipeline where rabbits play,
New messages hop in a clever way.
With queries sent and searches bright,
Legacy skills now take flight!
So let us cheer for changes grand,
As we dance through code, hand in hand! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix and removed fix labels Oct 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
ocp_pipeline/opm.py (1)

1064-1064: Deprecation Warning Version Number May Be Outdated

The deprecation warning in the match_legacy method mentions removal in ovos-core 0.1.0, which might already have been released. Consider updating the version number to reflect the accurate future version when this method will be removed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56b13b8 and bee33ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ocp_pipeline/legacy.py (2 hunks)
  • ocp_pipeline/opm.py (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
ocp_pipeline/legacy.py (3)

4-4: LGTM: Import addition aligns with session context handling.

The addition of dig_for_message import supports the PR's objective of maintaining message context for session handling.


81-82: LGTM: Message context propagation with a thread-safety consideration.

The message context is correctly propagated to send_query. However, there's a potential thread-safety issue with the self.waiting flag, which could lead to race conditions if multiple searches are performed concurrently.

Let's verify if concurrent searches are possible in the codebase:

Consider using a threading.Event or similar synchronization primitive instead of a boolean flag for thread-safe operation:

from threading import Event

# In __init__
self.waiting = Event()

# In search method
self.waiting.set()
while self.waiting.is_set() and time.time() - start_ts <= timeout:
    time.sleep(0.2)
self.waiting.clear()
✅ Verification successful

Thread safety concern is valid but low risk in current implementation

The code review's thread safety concern is valid but the actual risk is low in the current implementation because:

  1. The waiting flag is only used within the search method as a timeout mechanism
  2. The results collection happens through message passing via the bus system
  3. Each search query maintains separate result collections in dictionaries keyed by phrase:
    • self.query_replies[phrase]
    • self.query_extensions[phrase]

While using an Event would be a cleaner implementation, the current code is functionally safe because:

  • Results are isolated by search phrase
  • The waiting flag only affects timeout behavior
  • The bus message handling is thread-safe by design

The suggested improvement would be an enhancement rather than fixing a critical issue.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for potential concurrent usage patterns
rg -B 2 -A 2 "\.search\(" 

Length of output: 465


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any threading or async related code in the legacy.py file
rg -B 3 -A 3 "threading|asyncio|concurrent|Thread|async|await" ocp_pipeline/legacy.py

# Also check the class implementation to understand the waiting flag usage
cat ocp_pipeline/legacy.py

Length of output: 4145


70-74: LGTM: Robust message context handling implementation.

The implementation properly maintains message context through the following mechanisms:

  1. Accepts an optional message parameter
  2. Uses a fallback chain (provided -> dig_for_message -> empty)
  3. Forwards context when emitting the query

Let's verify the message context preservation pattern is consistent across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let's search for these message handling patterns to verify the consistency across the codebase. The previous search might have failed due to case sensitivity or incomplete pattern matching.


Message context preservation pattern is consistently implemented

The verification confirms that the message context preservation pattern is consistently implemented across the codebase:

  1. dig_for_message() is used consistently as a fallback in both legacy.py and opm.py with the same pattern: message or dig_for_message() or Message("")
  2. Message forwarding via message.forward() is used consistently throughout the codebase for maintaining context in message bus communications
  3. The pattern of preserving message context is uniform across different event handlers and message processing functions

The implementation in send_query follows the established pattern in the codebase and maintains message context appropriately.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar message context preservation patterns
rg -A 2 "dig_for_message\(\)" 

Length of output: 465


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for message forwarding patterns and context preservation
rg -B 2 -A 2 '\.forward\('

# Search for dig_for_message usage with proper case
rg -B 2 -A 2 'dig_for_message\(\)'

# Search for message parameter handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'def $_(self, $_, message: Optional[Message] = None)'

Length of output: 4150

ocp_pipeline/opm.py (7)

17-17: Import Statement Updated Correctly

The import statement now includes IntentHandlerMatch and ConfidenceMatcherPipeline from ovos_plugin_manager.templates.pipeline, which are necessary for handling intent matches and confidence levels.


1073-1073: Inheritance Structure Adjusted for MycroftCPSLegacyPipeline

The MycroftCPSLegacyPipeline class now correctly inherits from both ConfidenceMatcherPipeline and OVOSAbstractApplication, ensuring it has access to necessary methods and properties from both parent classes.


1076-1078: Superclasses Initialized Properly in __init__ Method

The __init__ method correctly initializes both parent classes:

  • Calls OVOSAbstractApplication.__init__ with appropriate parameters.
  • Calls ConfidenceMatcherPipeline.__init__ to ensure proper setup.

1081-1081: Event Handler Registration Confirmed

An event handler for "ocp:legacy_cps" is registered with the handle_legacy_cps method, marked as an intent handler. Ensure that handle_legacy_cps is implemented correctly to handle legacy CPS intents.


1085-1085: Override of match Method Ensures Proper Intent Matching

The match method is overridden in MycroftCPSLegacyPipeline to match legacy Mycroft CommonPlay skills when legacy_cps is enabled in the configuration. This allows for compatibility with legacy skills.


1108-1112: Correct Construction of IntentHandlerMatch Object

The IntentHandlerMatch is created with:

  • match_type set to "ocp:legacy_cps".
  • match_data containing the query and confidence level.
  • skill_id set to OCP_ID.
  • utterance passed correctly.

This ensures the intent is appropriately recognized and handled.


1123-1123: Ensure self.mycroft_cps is Properly Initialized

In the handle_legacy_cps method, the call to self.mycroft_cps.search(utt, message=message) relies on self.mycroft_cps being initialized. Verify that LegacyCommonPlay is correctly instantiated in the __init__ method and that the search method functions as expected.

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit 9a85887 into dev Oct 31, 2024
5 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the fix/legacy branch October 31, 2024 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant