Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moved the variable ACE_TAO_OPTION to the packageconfig 'doc-group3' #37

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

vermaete
Copy link
Contributor

A rather small PR to change the variable to decide if the docgroup v2 or v3 is used into a package config.
This is a more Yocto way of doing the same.

The selection to use ACE_TAO version 2 or 3 is is now in the packageconfig 'doc-group3'.
Default the version 2 is used. As it is in the configuration of OpenDDS.

Although the syntax was correct before, using variables is tainting the global namespace of Yocto.
And using a packageconfig is more the yocto way.

@vermaete vermaete marked this pull request as draft February 14, 2024 19:10
@vermaete vermaete marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 05:50
@vermaete vermaete marked this pull request as draft February 17, 2024 16:32
The selection to use ACE_TAO version 2 or 3 is is now in the
packageconfig 'doc-group3'.
Default the version 2 is used.  As it is in the configuration of
OpenDDS.

Although the syntax was correct before,  using variables is tainting
the global namespace of Yocto.
And using a packageconfig is more the yocto way.

Signed-off-by: Jan Vermaete <[email protected]>
@vermaete vermaete marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2024 19:29
@vermaete
Copy link
Contributor Author

vermaete commented Feb 17, 2024

@jrw972 If you would like to review? Changes are tested here. The catch why it took longer is that the PACKAGECONFIG option to set doc-group3 has to be done on the native version of the recipe too. I changed the readme file for that.

@jrw972 jrw972 merged commit 6fb5ee1 into OpenDDS:master Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants