Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove promots assistant route config #855

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

zhendi
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhendi zhendi commented Dec 17, 2024

What this PR does:

  • Remove promots assistant route config

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Type of changes
Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

Feature/Issue validation/testing:

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes and relevant result summary.

  • Test A

  • Test B

  • Logs

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • I have added unit/e2e tests that prove your fix is effective or that this feature works.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • I have reviewed my own code and ensured that it follows the project's style guidelines.

Release note:


MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

This Merge Request removes the prompts assistant route configuration from the application. Specifically, it deletes the reference to the "prompts/assistant.html" template in the router setup, streamlining the routing configuration and potentially fixing related issues. This change simplifies the codebase by eliminating unused or redundant route configurations.

Key updates:

  1. Removed the "prompts/assistant.html" template reference from the router configuration.

@starship-github
Copy link

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 90.

Analysis for the evaluation score:
  • The code change may not include corresponding unit tests.
  • The code change may not include corresponding integration testing.
Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

@hiveer hiveer merged commit 4ab3cfd into main Dec 17, 2024
3 checks passed
@hiveer hiveer deleted the csghub__remove-promots-assistant-route-config branch December 17, 2024 02:36
@starship-github
Copy link

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants