Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IMP] account_statement_base: no need to depend on account_reconcile_model_oca tests #743

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

xaviedoanhduy
Copy link
Contributor

In 16.0, a PR was added to "Link to Account Move Lines in Statements"
it was forward ported to 17.0, which introduced a dep on account_reconcile_model_oca for tests.
this dependency is strictly needed and actually unwelcome in some contexts where we might want accountant_statement-import modules without account_reconcile_model_oca.
so this PR: will simplify the test, it will no longer have a dependency on account_reconcile_model_oca, making the modules in accountant_statement-import depend on account_statement_base and will no longer have overlapping dependencies from account_reconcile_model_oca.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @alexis-via,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 17.0 milestone Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Of course! Fast-tracking the patch.

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 17.0-ocabot-merge-pr-743-by-pedrobaeza-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 4da20a2 into OCA:17.0 Nov 14, 2024
5 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at cd09680. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants