sbcl: fix check phase for darwin 24.05 only

[hraban]

Things done

See #359214 and in particular @szlend’s comment. Thanks to @pcboy for reporting.

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[szlend]

Does this need to go through staging-24.05 if it's only rebuilding 11-100 packages? Otherwise it looks good to me.

[hraban]

no it's fine to include somewhere directly I just don't know what the proper target branch is. What's the 24.05 equivalent of master?

Although I am surprised at the low rebuild count... maybe because it fixes a previously broken package? On master, changing sbcl causes an avalanche of >1k lisp package rebuilds.