-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feishin: 0.5.1 -> 0.6.1, build from source #303638
Conversation
Addresses NixOS#296939 (build from source). Continues the work started by @dotlambda in NixOS#288210. Co-authored-by: Robert Schütz <[email protected]>
Diff: jeffvli/feishin@v0.5.1...v0.6.1 Changelog: https://github.com/jeffvli/feishin/releases/tag/v0.6.1 Feishin now depends on electron_27; electron_25 has been marked as EOL since 9652f98. Fixes NixOS#287765 (package update request) and addresses NixOS#295770 (outdated Electron).
1594498
to
7f58ce0
Compare
Well, this is great. Builds and runs fine on my system:
|
Stellar work. Builds and runs fine for me on linux. Unfortunately I have a build failure on my M1 mac. Log is here. |
@lunik1 First of all, thank you for having provided your NUR feishin package (which I noticed just now is marked as Thank you so much for having tested this package on A quick |
No worries! Thanks for actually putting in the work and getting the source build working! It not working on |
Addresses the comment NixOS#303638 (comment) following NixOS#303638.
Follows NixOS#303638 and feishin darwin builds' fix.
Description of changes
Addresses #296939 by building Feishin from source. /cc @YoshiRulz
Fixes #287765 (package update request). /cc @nadir-ishiguro
Addresses #295770 (outdated Electron). /cc @yu-re-ka
Should also fix #262739 (build failure). /cc @lunik1
This PR continues the work started by @dotlambda in #288210.
(@dotlambda, I hope you don't mind I've added you as a
Co-authored-by
of the first commit; can remove if necessary.)Couldn't test this on
darwin
, so I'm unsure how the desktop entry plays out in MacOS systems.Maintainer: @onny
(while it is mostly ready to review, I did accidentally press the "ready to review" button, since I assumed I'd be force-pushing some changes after review, maybe. speaking of which... I sincerely apologize for the absolute spam in all the mentioned issues and pull-requests...)
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.