Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tutorial alpha user feedback: Building a model of Parkinson's disease using Neural Mass models #30

Open
sbrincat opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@sbrincat
Copy link
Collaborator

General
As presented, I don’t feel like it’s made clear what this tutorial adds to the tutorials. Setting aside the “Getting Started” Wilson-Cowan model, I think this is the first real introduction to neural mass models. I wonder if we should make that, and the transition from the PING tutorial, a bit more explicit? Something along the lines of “In the previous tutorial, we built a model by adding and connecting single neurons. Now we will zoom out and model entire neural populations using neural mass models. [then briefly define/explain neural mass models…]”

  • The title of this tutorial is too confusingly similar to the next one. Can we maybe change it to something like “Building a model of the Basal Ganglia using Neural Mass models” (esp. since it’s not clear whether the Parkinsonian BG is even being modeled here)?
  • Link to “Example 1” leads back to the same page (auto-link).
  • This tutorial ends abruptly with running the simulation. Could maybe we have some plot of the output here, and some wrap up of what was covered?

Cell 2

  • “Here we demonstrate a different approach by adding edges one by one”. With the current tutorial order, add_edge!() now appears prior to this in both the Wilson-Cowan and PING tutorials, so maybe we should remove this to avoid confusion?
@agchesebro
Copy link
Member

General thought while working through the tutorial fixes for this: do we maybe want a figure illustrating this circuit? It could be from the GUI with the circuit to avoid creating a bunch of new illustration work.

@sbrincat
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Agree that this tutorial feels maybe a bit plain, and could use a circuit figure to illustrate it. I can ask Annabel in our Friday meeting if she might have time to work something up.

@agchesebro agchesebro self-assigned this Oct 31, 2024
@agchesebro
Copy link
Member

Overhauling this tutorial over in 478. New version should be ready to go whenever the decision about the illustration is made!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants