You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
General
As presented, I don’t feel like it’s made clear what this tutorial adds to the tutorials. Setting aside the “Getting Started” Wilson-Cowan model, I think this is the first real introduction to neural mass models. I wonder if we should make that, and the transition from the PING tutorial, a bit more explicit? Something along the lines of “In the previous tutorial, we built a model by adding and connecting single neurons. Now we will zoom out and model entire neural populations using neural mass models. [then briefly define/explain neural mass models…]”
The title of this tutorial is too confusingly similar to the next one. Can we maybe change it to something like “Building a model of the Basal Ganglia using Neural Mass models” (esp. since it’s not clear whether the Parkinsonian BG is even being modeled here)?
Link to “Example 1” leads back to the same page (auto-link).
This tutorial ends abruptly with running the simulation. Could maybe we have some plot of the output here, and some wrap up of what was covered?
Cell 2
“Here we demonstrate a different approach by adding edges one by one”. With the current tutorial order, add_edge!() now appears prior to this in both the Wilson-Cowan and PING tutorials, so maybe we should remove this to avoid confusion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
General thought while working through the tutorial fixes for this: do we maybe want a figure illustrating this circuit? It could be from the GUI with the circuit to avoid creating a bunch of new illustration work.
Agree that this tutorial feels maybe a bit plain, and could use a circuit figure to illustrate it. I can ask Annabel in our Friday meeting if she might have time to work something up.
General
As presented, I don’t feel like it’s made clear what this tutorial adds to the tutorials. Setting aside the “Getting Started” Wilson-Cowan model, I think this is the first real introduction to neural mass models. I wonder if we should make that, and the transition from the PING tutorial, a bit more explicit? Something along the lines of “In the previous tutorial, we built a model by adding and connecting single neurons. Now we will zoom out and model entire neural populations using neural mass models. [then briefly define/explain neural mass models…]”
Cell 2
add_edge!()
now appears prior to this in both the Wilson-Cowan and PING tutorials, so maybe we should remove this to avoid confusion?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: