-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix IO for LHA bot #238
Fix IO for LHA bot #238
Conversation
@alecandido the trigger for #227 is still not optimal, I think ... run 14 and 15 have been triggered simultaneously and I suspect by me asking for 2 reviewers - but of course we need only one run, regardless of how many people I ask |
@felixhekhorn true, but I believe it should do so if you select them together. You can select multiple reviewer in a single shot, without exiting the dropdown menu, but if you exit, you're filing two requests in a row (even if they are later on grouped in the PR board). |
The |
yes! 🎉 |
882487b
to
51d66ac
Compare
I didn't even have to drop it manually: they were the same diff, and Git figured out on its own he didn't have to reapply it twice. |
@felixhekhorn as soon as the workflow will pass again, I believe we can merge! |
but I cannot reproduce this locally
Note that the obs hash is not the same ... I seem to remember to have seen this before ... @giacomomagni ? or @t7phy ? |
@felixhekhorn I acknowledge that to be an issue, but it is not #237 With the idea of keeping PRs short and atomic, this has already solved its related issue, and it already provides a useful result, even though not perfect. |
Closes #237
This PR fixes
mu2grid
->mugrid
in LHAflavored_mugrid
to be serializable and adds the relevant testQ2grid
in LHA benchmarkQ2grid
in navigatorQ2grid
in docsfurther comments:
QrefQED
since there is no such thing any longer - what should we do? should we translate the existence tocouplings.em_running
? should we change the theory again? (meaningbanana
)