Ab/fix no2 rescale

[abarciauskas-bgse]

At some point the no2-monthly collection lost the cog_default data from "summaries". This fixes that issue but it may be something that needs to be addressed in the collection itself as well.

I found an example of a collection that does have the cog_default object in it's summaries object: https://staging-stac.delta-backend.com/collections/ecco-surface-height-change.

https://staging-stac.delta-backend.com/collections/no2-monthly has no cog_default object in it's summaries.

cc @anayeaye

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions]

PR Preview Action v1.4.7
🚀 Deployed preview to https://NASA-IMPACT.github.io/veda-docs/pr-preview/pr-118/
on branch gh-pages at 2024-02-15 15:20 UTC

[anayeaye]

@abarciauskas-bgse thanks for catching this! When we moved to multi-assets for collections we removed the automated generation of cog_default min max in summaries because this asset is no longer guaranteed in all collections. When the render metadata are published for this no2-monthly collection, I think we should revisit this notebook to utilize them in the absence of a cog_default summary.

EDIT: also when we update that collection, we'll be fixing the other issues that make the collection invalid. Hopefully that is very soon.

[abarciauskas-bgse]

@anayeaye thanks for reviewing - it might be overkill but I wonder if integration tests from NASA-IMPACT/veda-jh-environments#44 could be run whenever there are large STAC metadata changes 🤔