Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Radar reflectivity #223

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Radar reflectivity #223

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

ctgh
Copy link
Collaborator

@ctgh ctgh commented Aug 23, 2024

This PR makes various changes to opsinputs to allow radar reflectivity processing:

  • Add RadarZ Varobs and CX namelists.
  • Update the Varobs and CX writers.
  • Add a variety of specific and more general ctests.
  • Update the netCDF generation script and add some new netCDF test files.

Coordinate merge

Please merge at the same time as:

Copy link
Contributor

@PJLevensMO PJLevensMO left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks Chris

@matthewrmshin
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this a coordinate merge with MetOffice/sith#374?

@matthewrmshin
Copy link
Collaborator

(I'm seeing some sith/malak kgo compare failures for kgo_glu* runs with an mo-bundle build with this branch + jjaux PR. Not sure if they are expected or not. I'll attempt to re-run with isolated changes to understand cause.)

Copy link
Collaborator

@matthewrmshin matthewrmshin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested in my environment. Works as expected.

@matthewrmshin matthewrmshin merged commit 7614ded into develop Oct 2, 2024
5 checks passed
@matthewrmshin matthewrmshin deleted the feature/radar_reflectivity branch October 2, 2024 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants