-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix crash due to bad rounding in BarChart when no y_step was provided and the max y value was close to 0 #3935
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…user and the max y value is very small
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Hey thanks for the PR! Do you mind adding a (non-graphical) test for this? |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Hello and thank you for the reply. I added one simple test and checked to make sure it was failing before this PR, but don't throw errors after this PR. If it's not enough, I could add more tests. |
I think it looks fine from my cursory testing :) |
I added comments and fixed the linting. Do you think the explanations are clear enough? I can expand them if needed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change looks fine to me, but after trying some different combinations, it seems the y-axis is always displayed as 0, which doesn't seem very helpful.
Instead of trying to compute a new step value, what do you think about forcing the user to pass in a y_step
?
names = list(range(len(values))) | ||
chart = BarChart( | ||
values=values, | ||
bar_names=["one", "two", "three", "four", "five"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did you mean to pass names
to bar_names
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, thank you, I will fix that.
I may have broken something with my last commits, because I recently made an animation with very low values that worked perfectly from 6 bars of values 1/10000th to 1. Could you share some non-working examples, please? I could also try to understand what's going wrong and fix it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
# Handle cases where min and max are both positive or both negative
if x_min < x_max < 0 or x_max > x_min > 0:
to
# Handle cases where min and max are both positive or both negative
if x_min < x_max < 0 or x_max > x_min >= 0:
In the first commit (used for my renderings), I also added this change because a range from 0 to 0.000001 was not considered strictly positive or negative for some reason. I later reversed this change because it seemed to break a lot of tests. Maybe this is the cause of your troubles.
from manim import *
class BarChartExample(Scene):
def construct(self):
values = [1 / 10000 for _ in range(8)]
chart = BarChart(
values=values,
bar_names=["one", "two", "three", "four", "five"],
y_range=[0, 2 / 10000],
y_length=6,
x_length=10,
x_axis_config={"font_size": 36},
)
c_bar_lbls = chart.get_bar_labels(font_size=48)
self.add(chart, c_bar_lbls)
config.preview = True
BarChartExample().render() |
Overview: What does this pull request change?
This PR fixes a bug in BarChart that lead to a crash if the user did not provide the
y_step
(i.e. tick rate, the user providedy_range=[y_min, y_max]
) and the y values were very close to 0 (round(max(ys), 2)
== 0).Motivation and Explanation: Why and how do your changes improve the library?
When the user only provided the minimum and maximum of the y_range, the code for BarChart was deducing the tick rate for the y axis using the following code:
However, this returns 0 if the maximum is small, because it is rounded down to zero. This lead to a division by zero in a np.arrange downstream. This issue can be fixed by replacing the
2
by a computed value.This PR replaces the hard-coded$\max\left(\lceil - \log_{10}(x) \rceil, ~ 2\right)$ , with $x$ being equal to
2
withmax(self.values) / y_length
(unrounded y_step in the original code). To ensure retro-compatibility, the newly computed value can't go below 2, in the case of large y values.Reviewer Checklist