-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update docker-compose.yaml #233
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifying the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Docker
participant BuildContext
User->>Docker: Start web service
Docker->>BuildContext: Build image from context
BuildContext-->>Docker: Image built
Docker-->>User: Web service running
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docker-compose.yaml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docker-compose.yaml (1)
5-6
: Verify CI/CD pipeline compatibility.
The switch from trainwithshubham/node-app:latest
to local builds may impact existing CI/CD pipelines. Please ensure:
- Build dependencies are available in CI/CD environment
- Build time impact is acceptable
- Pipeline configurations are updated accordingly
#!/bin/bash
# Check for CI configuration files
echo "Checking CI configuration files..."
for file in .github/workflows/*.yml .gitlab-ci.yml .circleci/config.yml; do
if [ -f "$file" ]; then
echo "Found CI config: $file"
cat "$file" | grep -A 5 "docker"
fi
done
build: | ||
context: . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding version control for reproducible builds.
While using local builds provides flexibility, consider adding a version tag to ensure reproducible builds across environments:
services:
web:
build:
context: .
+ dockerfile: Dockerfile
+ args:
+ NODE_VERSION: 16-alpine
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
💡 Codebase verification
Local build configuration is valid but needs improvements
The switch to local build context is supported by a valid Dockerfile, however there are some concerns:
- The Dockerfile uses an outdated Node.js version (12.2.0) which is no longer supported
- Running tests during image build (
RUN npm run test
) may not be a best practice - No
.dockerignore
file was found which could lead to unnecessary files in build context
Recommendations:
- Update Node.js base image to an LTS version (e.g., node:20-alpine)
- Consider moving test execution to CI pipeline instead of Dockerfile
- Add a
.dockerignore
file to exclude node_modules, test files, and other unnecessary content
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Dockerfile existence and build configuration.
The change from a pre-built image to local build requires a valid Dockerfile in the root directory.
Let me try another approach to verify the Dockerfile and CI configuration.
Let me check the content of the Dockerfile since we confirmed its existence.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Dockerfile exists and validate its content
if [ -f "Dockerfile" ]; then
echo "Dockerfile found. Checking content..."
cat Dockerfile
else
echo "Error: Dockerfile not found in the root directory"
exit 1
fi
Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Dockerfile in the repository
echo "Searching for Dockerfile..."
fd Dockerfile
# Check for CI configuration files in specific locations
echo -e "\nSearching for CI config files..."
fd -t f "^\.gitlab-ci\.yml$|^config\.yml$|^.*\.ya?ml$" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 354
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Display Dockerfile contents
echo "Checking Dockerfile contents:"
cat Dockerfile
# List all yaml/yml files recursively to find CI configs
echo -e "\nSearching for CI config files in repository:"
fd -e yml -e yaml
Length of output: 734
Summary by CodeRabbit
web
service to build a Docker image from the local context instead of using a pre-built image.