Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding a docker file and add k8s deployments manifest file #212

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

priyadarshi0811
Copy link

@priyadarshi0811 priyadarshi0811 commented Sep 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated visual theme for the application with a new header and button colors.
    • Revised main heading and input field label to align with the new focus on weekly agenda planning.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated DevSecOps documentation and configurations that may have caused confusion.
  • Chores

    • Eliminated unnecessary configuration files related to Docker, Kubernetes, and Terraform, streamlining project management.
    • Removed obsolete Jenkins pipeline and related resources for improved clarity.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the complete removal of several key files related to a DevSecOps pipeline for a Node.js application, including the Jenkinsfile, README documentation, Docker Compose configurations, and Kustomize resources. Additionally, Kubernetes deployment configurations were removed, along with Terraform configurations for Docker resources and a SonarQube project properties file. Minor stylistic updates were also made to the user interface of the application.

Changes

Files Change Summary
DevSecOps/Jenkinsfile, DevSecOps/README.md, docker-compose.yaml, kustomize/README.md, kustomize/base/app-1/app-1.yml, kustomize/base/app-1/kustomization.yml, kustomize/base/ingress/ingress.yml, kustomize/base/ingress/kustomization.yml, kustomize/overlays/dev/dev-ingress-patch.json, kustomize/overlays/dev/kustomization.yml, kustomize/overlays/prd/kustomization.yml, kustomize/overlays/prd/prd-ingress-patch.json, sonar-project.properties, terraform/main.tf, terraform/terraform.tf Complete removal of files related to the DevSecOps pipeline, Kubernetes configurations, and Terraform resources.
k8s/deployment.yml, k8s/pod.yml, k8s/replica-sets.yml, k8s/service.yml Complete removal of Kubernetes deployment, pod, replica set, and service configurations.
views/todo.ejs Stylistic updates including color changes and text modifications for the user interface.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant UI
    participant Server
    participant Database

    User->>UI: Interacts with application
    UI->>Server: Sends request
    Server->>Database: Queries data
    Database-->>Server: Returns data
    Server-->>UI: Sends response
    UI-->>User: Displays updated interface
Loading

🐰 In the land of code, where changes bloom,
A Jenkinsfile vanished, leaving room.
Docker and Terraform took their leave,
While Kubernetes danced, new images to weave.
With colors bright and agendas to plan,
The rabbit hops on, a happy coding fan! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f8fedc and e54cfde.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • Dockerfile (0 hunks)
  • Jenkinsfile (0 hunks)
  • k8s/deployment.yml (0 hunks)
  • k8s/pod.yml (0 hunks)
  • k8s/replica-sets.yml (0 hunks)
  • k8s/service.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
  • Dockerfile
  • Jenkinsfile
  • k8s/deployment.yml
  • k8s/pod.yml
  • k8s/replica-sets.yml
  • k8s/service.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de951ca and 6f8fedc.

Files selected for processing (21)
  • DevSecOps/Jenkinsfile (0 hunks)
  • DevSecOps/README.md (0 hunks)
  • Jenkinsfile (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.yaml (0 hunks)
  • k8s/deployment.yml (2 hunks)
  • k8s/pod.yml (1 hunks)
  • k8s/replica-sets.yml (2 hunks)
  • k8s/service.yml (1 hunks)
  • kustomize/README.md (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/base/app-1/app-1.yml (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/base/app-1/kustomization.yml (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/base/ingress/ingress.yml (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/base/ingress/kustomization.yml (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/overlays/dev/dev-ingress-patch.json (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/overlays/dev/kustomization.yml (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/overlays/prd/kustomization.yml (0 hunks)
  • kustomize/overlays/prd/prd-ingress-patch.json (0 hunks)
  • sonar-project.properties (0 hunks)
  • terraform/main.tf (0 hunks)
  • terraform/terraform.tf (0 hunks)
  • views/todo.ejs (4 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (15)
  • DevSecOps/Jenkinsfile
  • DevSecOps/README.md
  • docker-compose.yaml
  • kustomize/README.md
  • kustomize/base/app-1/app-1.yml
  • kustomize/base/app-1/kustomization.yml
  • kustomize/base/ingress/ingress.yml
  • kustomize/base/ingress/kustomization.yml
  • kustomize/overlays/dev/dev-ingress-patch.json
  • kustomize/overlays/dev/kustomization.yml
  • kustomize/overlays/prd/kustomization.yml
  • kustomize/overlays/prd/prd-ingress-patch.json
  • sonar-project.properties
  • terraform/main.tf
  • terraform/terraform.tf
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • Jenkinsfile
  • k8s/service.yml
  • views/todo.ejs
Additional context used
yamllint
k8s/replica-sets.yml

[error] 22-22: wrong indentation: expected 8 but found 6

(indentation)

checkov
k8s/replica-sets.yml

[MEDIUM] 1-23: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[MEDIUM] 1-23: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

Additional comments not posted (6)
k8s/pod.yml (2)

5-5: Verify the namespace change.

The namespace has been changed from node-app to node155. Please confirm if this change is intentional and aligns with the overall deployment strategy and cluster organization.

Ensure that the node155 namespace exists in the cluster before deploying this Pod configuration.


10-10: Review the container image change and Dockerfile.

The container image has been updated to darshif5/simple-node-app:node-todo. Please ensure that:

  1. The new image has been properly built, tested, and is compatible with the existing environment.
  2. The node-todo tag represents a stable and approved version of the application.
  3. The Dockerfile follows best practices for building the image, such as using a specific base image version, minimizing the number of layers, and properly setting up the application.

Please provide the Dockerfile for review to ensure it aligns with the image change and follows best practices.

k8s/replica-sets.yml (1)

5-5: Verify the namespace change across related resources and configurations.

The namespace has been changed from node-app to node155. Ensure that this change is consistently applied across all related Kubernetes resources (e.g., Services, Deployments, ConfigMaps) and any external configurations that reference the namespace.

Run the following script to verify the namespace usage:

Verification successful

Namespace change verified and consistently applied

The namespace change from 'node-app' to 'node155' has been successfully verified across all Kubernetes configuration files (.yml and .yaml). The following observations support this conclusion:

  • No occurrences of the old namespace 'node-app' were found.
  • The new namespace 'node155' is consistently used across multiple configuration files.
  • 'node155' is the only namespace declaration present in the Kubernetes resource files.

This change has been implemented correctly and consistently, aligning with the intended modifications described in the PR objectives.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the namespace change across related resources and configurations.

# Test 1: Search for the old namespace in Kubernetes resource files. Expect: No occurrences.
fd --type yaml --exec rg $'node-app'

# Test 2: Search for the new namespace in Kubernetes resource files. Expect: Consistent usage.
fd --type yaml --exec rg $'node155'

Length of output: 414


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the namespace change across related resources and configurations.

# Test 1: Search for the old namespace in Kubernetes resource files. Expect: No occurrences.
fd -e yml -e yaml -x rg -i 'namespace:\s*node-app' {}

# Test 2: Search for the new namespace in Kubernetes resource files. Expect: Consistent usage.
fd -e yml -e yaml -x rg -i 'namespace:\s*node155' {}

# Test 3: List all unique namespace declarations in Kubernetes resource files.
fd -e yml -e yaml -x rg -i 'namespace:' {} | sort | uniq

Length of output: 353

k8s/deployment.yml (3)

16-16: Skipped: Namespace change is consistent.

This change is consistent with the namespace change in the deployment metadata. No further action is required as the namespace change has already been verified.


5-5: Verify the namespace change.

Ensure that the node155 namespace exists and is intended for this deployment. Also, verify that the namespace change is consistently applied across all related Kubernetes resources to avoid deployment issues and resource isolation problems.

Run the following script to verify the namespace change:

Verification successful

Namespace change verified and consistently applied

The namespace change from 'node-app' to 'node155' has been successfully verified. The new namespace 'node155' is consistently used across multiple Kubernetes resource files, including:

  • k8s/deployment.yml
  • k8s/pod.yml
  • k8s/replica-sets.yml
  • k8s/service.yml

Additionally, there are no occurrences of the old 'node-app' namespace in any YAML files, indicating a complete transition to the new namespace.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the namespace change.

# Test 1: Check if the `node155` namespace exists.
# Expect: The namespace should exist.
kubectl get namespace node155

# Test 2: Search for the old namespace `node-app` usage in other YAML files.
# Expect: No occurrences of the old namespace.
fd -e yaml -X rg $'node-app'

Length of output: 228


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the namespace change in YAML files

# Search for the new namespace 'node155' in YAML files
echo "Searching for 'node155' namespace:"
fd -e yml -e yaml -X rg 'namespace:\s*node155'

echo -e "\nSearching for old 'node-app' namespace:"
fd -e yml -e yaml -X rg 'namespace:\s*node-app'

Length of output: 538


22-22: Verify the image change and perform thorough testing.

Ensure that the darshif5/simple-node-app:node-todo image exists and is the intended image for this deployment. Thoroughly test the application with the new image to avoid any unexpected behavior or compatibility issues.

Run the following script to verify the image existence:

labels:
tier: node-label
spec:
containers:
- name: node-container-rep
image: trainwithshubham/node-app-batch-6
image: darshif5/simple-node-app:node-todo
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Address the security concerns raised by the static analysis hints.

The updated container image (darshif5/simple-node-app:node-todo) should be reviewed to ensure it follows security best practices:

  1. Ensure that the container does not require or run with allowPrivilegeEscalation unless absolutely necessary. If privilege escalation is required, consider using a more granular security context or pod security policies to limit the scope of escalation.

  2. Avoid running the container as root. Instead, use a dedicated user with minimal required permissions. If root access is necessary for specific tasks, consider using securityContext.runAsNonRoot and securityContext.runAsUser to enforce running as a non-root user by default.

Do you want me to open a GitHub issue to track these security enhancements or provide guidance on implementing the recommended changes?

Tools
checkov

[MEDIUM] 1-23: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[MEDIUM] 1-23: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant